Talk:Todd Corporation

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Pakaraki in topic External links modified

Merge? edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result was merge into Todd Corporation. -- DarkCrowCaw 17:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

User Beagel has proposed that Todd Energy be merged with Todd Corporation, but there don't seem to be any points made to support this proposal. Is it Wikipedia policy that all subsidiaries be merged with their parent article? If so, articles like Bay of Plenty Electricity and King Country Energy should be merged in as well. The energy business of Todd Energy is quite different to the businesses of Todd Capital and Todd Motors. Merging all these different companies together would make a large diverse article, not easy to read. --Pakaraki (talk) 09:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

No, there is no such policy. If you just could make more clear the notability of Todd Energy, and interlinkage and difference between Todd Energy and Todd Corporation (in both articles), they could stay as separate articles. Beagel (talk) 06:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 9 November 2015 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Technical request to revert a not-discussed move. Wbm1058 (talk) 18:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


Draft:Todd CorporationTodd Corporation – Why was this moved out of the article namespace without prior discussion? The article has been around for several years and the sudden change of namespace looks incorrect. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ditto. Why is this article deleted without discussion? The subject is notable and relevant to many topic areas. Pakaraki (talk) 17:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Todd Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

That archive link looks ok. --Pakaraki (talk) 04:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)Reply