Talk:The Zero Theorem

Introduction

Hi, i dont feel its quite right to say that the movie is about to prove a theorem about the "meaning of life". That's a interpretation in a million, dont have to be in the introduction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.34.165.46 (talk) 02:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Official page

The film does have an "Official Page" now, which happens to be on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheZeroTheorem --79.193.50.130 (talk) 08:56, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

New USA distribution

I have no idea as to what may have happened behind the scenes, but there's a press release[1] now that the film has two new USA distributors: Amplify and Well Go USA. Amplify will handle distribution to cinemas, and Well Go USA has secured home video rights. --2.241.124.79 (talk) 22:39, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Does this have anything to do with it?

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/09/can-graffiti-be-copyrighted/380323/

Also, no mention of these suits? That's the reason I came to this page... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.65.96.49 (talk) 14:51, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Phobia of antiques

Really? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.246.132.178 (talk) 15:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Budget

• Tara Brady (2014-03-14). "Terry Gilliam: "The poetry of cinema has been replaced by the Dan Brown prose of cinema"". p. 3. Archived from the original on 2014-03-14. There have been numbers out there that are wrong. It cost $8.5 million.

Gilliam says budget figures are wrong, it cost $8.5 million. -- 109.78.217.95 (talk) 11:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Brazil Trilogy revert

I blithely reverted a false positive ClueBot edit. Mark in wiki then contested the IP user's edit I reverted to. Looking around a little, I found an interview that clarifies Gilliam's stance on the issue. I added it and the source alluded to by the IP to the article. Happy editing, Paradoctor (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Looks fine to me now. Thanks for your work. Mark in wiki (talk) 14:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

When The Adventures of Baron Munchausen was released, it was occasionally described as the third part of a trilogy consisting also of Time Bandits and Brazil. They were referred to as the 3 part story of one man as a child, an adult, and an old man. I suspect this current theory is a modification of the original odd desire to attribute the status of "trilogy" to Gilliam's movies when none exists. Hobbe Yonge (talk) 19:11, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Box office

How can you already have definite final box office figures when it's still in theaters in some countries? Here in Germany, it's only been released a month ago. You should at least state that that's not a final figure for worldwide grosses. --87.180.197.207 (talk) 04:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Eye covering

Anyone notice when he sleeps he wears the eye covering from La Jetée, the inspiration for 12 Monkeys. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 05:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Zero-energy universe

Maybe a reference to the Zero-energy universe hypothesis ("everything adds up to nothing") might be relevant? Or is the similarity just a coincidence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.216.10.72 (talk) 22:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)