Talk:The Scarlet Letter
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Scarlet Letter article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days  |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Scarlet Letterman" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Scarlet Letterman. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 15#Scarlet Letterman until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 03:49, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Reception edit
Reception needs work. It should reflect more modern day analysis as it is claimed to be a masterwork yet nearly half of the critics cited are negative. 2603:6010:11F0:3C0:71CC:AE7A:CEEB:4053 (talk) 03:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Should we remove this tag? edit
The "Adaptions and influences" section has been tagged as needing expansion. I looked at the main article. It's basically a lengthy list of references to it in mainly television. I honestly know of no other suitable way it could be summarized in the "Adaptions and influences" sections, so I think the tag should be removed. Should I go ahead — Python Drink (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Inclusion of Easy A in the Films section edit
I think that the 2010 film adaptation Easy A starring Emma Stone ought to be included in the Films section. -cspan02 (talk) 08:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)