Talk:The Phantom (1996 film)

Latest comment: 4 months ago by 109.76.139.141 in topic Joel Schumacher

Untitled

edit

I deleted the following from the article: The film was a box office flop, grossing less than a fourth of its original costs, and fared even worse with critics, recieving nearly univerally negative reviews. It was criticized for taking too many liberties with material from the comics, and for sacrificing style for substance. Several film magazines and critics site it as the worst, or at least one of the worst, comic book adaptions to date. This is perhaps the worst piece of editing I've ever seen on Wikipedia; all coming from the writer's head. Where's the facts? Come on, this is only written by some disgruntled fan, who didn't like the movie. It certainly doesn't belong here.

Fair use rationale for Image:Phantomzane2.jpg

edit
 

Image:Phantomzane2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply



Ghost Who Walks

edit

I didn't know about the new film in the pipeline until I read this page. Doing a web seach, I couldn't find much information about it on IMDB or anywhere else. Does anyone have more information about the script, cast, etc? 202.138.16.1 (talk) 04:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Phantompost.jpg

edit
 

Image:Phantompost.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

He will follow and marry her?

edit

The ending quote of the movie says "Fortunately, Diana knew her own mind and vowed to herself that she would return to the Bengalla Jungle." It is not suggested he will follow and marry her, but that she will return and marry him. It should be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.157.149.18 (talk) 04:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
? what type aircraft were used in the makeing of this movie Shenfoo (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2009 (UTC)shenfooReply

SyFy

edit

The Phantom (2009) (TV) at IMDb ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 00:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on The Phantom (1996 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Joel Schumacher

edit

Was Joel Schumacher ever really connected to this film or were people just confused by Schumacher directing The Phantom of the Opera (film) which had Schumacher attached as early as 1990[1] even though that film wasn't made until 2004? -- 109.76.196.221 (talk) 13:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I see from the article history that this claim was based on a 2014 article from the Daily Mail.[2] This does not inspire confidence.
Digging even further into the article history the claim was first added in 2007 without any explanation or sourcing.(diff) I do not find this claim credible in any way, it should probably be removed from the article. -- 109.76.196.221 (talk) 13:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I removed the dubious claim.(diff) Please note WP:BURDEN, it must be credibly sourced before anyone considers adding it back. -- 109.76.139.141 (talk) 13:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply