This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
As per WP:MOSLEAD I think it's best to keep only one translation of the name in the lead. Both translated names can go to the info box.
one art historian Can we know who?
At places you say 1844-45, elsewhere you say 1812-1872. Consistency would be good.
Article:
Say either Romantic or romantic.
No copyvio issues, images properly licensed. The above points addressed I would be happy to promote this. Sainsf<^>Feel at home 15:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
All done, but I can't see where it says 1812-1872 for the life of me. Please help me out. Thanks, 23 editor (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I see what you mean. I've removed it as off-topic. I thought you were saying the article mentioned the painting as being dated 1812-72. 23 editor (talk) 17:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I believe this is ready for promotion. Great job! Sainsf<^>Feel at home 17:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
