Talk:Teochew people

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Remove Lam Truong pic

edit

Is there any point for "us" (mostly the Vietnamese people) to consider him as a "Teochew" (I know I won't)? He speaks Teochew language? Does he call/consider/refer himself as Chinese? Have an ancestral village in China to pay homage (real Chinese know what it means)? He looks like a Chinese, really? Or a typical "brown monkey" aka Khmer, Cham, Native SEA, etc. (that's what the Vietnamese told me). Is obvious he is a mix of X and Y and Z, and so forth. (Go learn some DNA, then come back to me again).

So, when one was mixed to the a degree of unrecognizable by "his fellow Chinese", would he/she still be consider of being a Chinese?

How much Chinese blood does he have? 1%? 10%? 50%? 1/2? 1/16? 1/32? Really?!!? Does it really matter? He's a Vietnamese, not Chinese. Period.

Do a search on the internet, people are bashing "these people" who have inferiority complex. I understand the history of living under the Chinese Imperialism for thousands of years, but that does not make them a Chinese.

"Brown" Viets VS "Yellow" Viets http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=240431 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.138.156.2 (talk) 23:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is getting a bit of a laughing stock, sorry but truth hurts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.138.156.2 (talk) 23:08, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Sammi 1.jpg

edit
 

Image:Sammi 1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Citation for possible origin of the people

edit

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2886054/ 99.52.102.154 (talk) 00:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Taiwan

edit

Do any Teochew people live in Taiwan? Badagnani (talk) 16:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reply: I think there are, but the group is probably too small; just like you don't really find Cantonese in Taiwan. During those days, it is the Hakkas from Guangdong who migrated to Taiwan

Reply 2: Rainie Yang is Cantonese. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.138.156.2 (talk) 22:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Danny Lee

edit

I have removed the belowed as Danny Lee is known to be a Shanghaiese.

History

edit

The history section claims that their ancestors came from north China (Henan and Shanxi). Surely this is very unlikely given the closeness of the Teowchiu language and the Minnan language. However it is claimed/known that the Hakka (Kejia) people, who are neighbours of the Chaozhou people, were originally from Henan and Shanxi. Did someone get their lines crossed about the Chaozhou people and the Hakka people in the writing of this section? 86.162.140.127 (talk) 01:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notable people section is too long

edit

The "Notable Teochew people" takes up over half the length of the article as it currently stands. It should either be split to its own article, or significantly trimmed. (Also, it is quite poorly sourced, but that's a separate matter.) V2Blast (talk) 07:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Teochew people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply