This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Los Angeles Rams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Los Angeles Rams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Los Angeles RamsWikipedia:WikiProject Los Angeles RamsTemplate:WikiProject Los Angeles RamsLos Angeles Rams articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
@Dissident93: If a player is claimed off waivers, their contract is automatically inherited by the claiming team. When a contract is originally signed, the execution of it is typically contingent on the player passing a physical. However, for a claimed contract, I do not believe it needs to be executed since it was never terminated. In fact, it appears McKinley also failed his physical with the Raiders, which is why they placed him on injured reserve. The other two teams who claimed him had the same option of placing him on IR, but instead chose to waive him with the "failed physical" designations. I think the prose of the article is fine as is, there's no reason to have two stub sections about his five-day tenures with the teams while he went through COVID protocols, but I think the infobox should include the 49ers and Bengals as teams he was under contract with for consistency purposes. Eagles24/7(C)20:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Oh it did, I simply forgot to respond to it. Anyway, while you make fair points I feel like not even being on a team's roster for 24 hours due to failing a qualifying condition is really infobox-worthy. The fact that the Raiders placed him on IR instead of voiding his contract like the other two is more significant, in my opinion. ~ Dissident93(talk)01:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Dissident93: Technically, he was on the Bengals' roster with a roster exemption for six days and on the 49ers' roster with a roster exemption for two days. And as I said above, waiver claims are not contingent on passing a team physical. Also, the Bengals and 49ers did not "void" his contract, they cut him the same way the Falcons originally did. I am unlikely to find proof but I'm sure he was paid for the near-week he was on the Bengals' roster. This matter is a triviality but still worth discussing IMO. Eagles24/7(C)03:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Dissident93: I don't think I have to. Just because a team is given a roster exemption for a player does not mean the player was not part of the active roster. The roster exemption just means that the Bengals and 49ers did not have to cut a player to make room for McKinley. Pcurry2005 (talk)
