Talk:Susan Helper
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Untitled edit
Melania, I had one suggestion and one question. My suggestion is to make sure you define multi-employer pension plans. Second, I wondered how this proposal overlaps with the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corportion? https://www.pbgc.gov/? Cassell04 (talk) 13:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- I will find a definition and add it to the content and purpose section. Also, from my understanding the PBGC is the blanket agency most unions work under for these pensions. It's also where the pension insurance coverage is decided, but is ultimately failing and thus is obsolete. This is a portion that is still unclear to me and I'm still researching on, I talk to Mr. Ryan on Friday 3/5 and will get more from him as well. Malaniabirney (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Melania this is really good. Cassell04 (talk) 14:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Malaniabirney.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Notes edit
Great job. You might also search for works that cite Susan's work. In other words, you might look for other scholarly or government work that uses Susan's work and then talk about how Susan contributed to their understanding. I like the outline.Cassell04 (talk) 13:43, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
I think this is a fantastic first draft. The core information about Susan's career is definitely well-described and thoroughly cited. This seems to be the information that makes Susan worthy of her own Wikipedia article, so I think your focus on her career is justified. It might be interesting, however, to include some info about her early life; some basic biographical information (date of birth, hometown) and her motivation for entering the field of economics could help provide a better portrait of her and would be part of the standard format for an article like this. Speaking of Wikipedia formatting, I appreciate that you've organized your article in a very logical, understandable way. Nice work! Dwolfor3 (talk) 21:46, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
This is a very good first draft for this project. Your interview with her will definitely add information which you can not find anywhere else which will make this page even better. Just make sure that you're checking for simply grammatical errors such as "She been to the University of Oxford,". Other than this, I think you are on the way to making a very good contribution to Wikipedia. Blue2gold (talk) 21:40, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Moving page edit
I'm going to go ahead and move this page live. This still needs some tweaking and more non-primary sources, but from what I can see she passes notability guidelines per WP:NPROF. Her citation index is impressive enough, to be honest. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)