Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Economics
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Economics page. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
WikiProject Economics | (Rated NA-class) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
![]() | WikiProject Economics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 19 December 2011. |
Hélène ReyEdit
I've added some initial discussion of the contributions of Prof. Hélène Rey here: [1]. There's a lot more that can be added, if anyone's familiar with her work and contributions.
To what extent does gross private domestic investment determine the rate of growth?Edit
The article on gross private domestic investment says it "is an important component of GDP because it provides an indicator of the future productive capacity of the economy." To what extent does GPDI actually determine the rate of growth?
Please answer at Talk:Economic growth#To what extent does gross private domestic investment determine the rate of growth? thanks. EllenCT (talk)
Davos question listed at Redirects for discussionEdit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Davos question. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.
Hey folks! I just created this article and it was moved to the draft-space before I added the references :-/ Could anyone review it and help out with moving it to the article-space? Thanks Fede.Campana (talk)
That's the link for easy access: Draft:Richard Duncan (economist) Fede.Campana (talk)
Proposed deletion of Energy qualityEdit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Energy_quality_(2nd_nomination)
Merger discussion for Demand responseEdit
An article that you have been involved in editing—Demand response—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Economic development in IndiaEdit
Economic development in India has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 21:17, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Roberto Moreno. Sindicalista. Nicaragua.Edit
Datos incorrectos. Sería mejor hacer de nuevo el artículo antes que reeditarlo. 2803:2D60:1104:279C:6987:F508:A69E:45A6 (talk) 06:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Panic of 1907Edit
User:Buidhe has nominated Panic of 1907 for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting article expansion help in Pakistan economic crisis articleEdit
Already article 2022–2023 Pakistan economic crisis is not in good updated condition, moreover recently WP has been censored in Pakistan. The article seem to need article expansion help to keep adequately updated.
Good article reassessment for Economy of IranEdit
Economy of Iran has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Femke (alt) (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Edgar SpeyerEdit
User:Buidhe has nominated Edgar Speyer for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!Edit
Hello, |
Good article reassessment for Economy of OhioEdit
Economy of Ohio has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:03, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
The article Robert Wiedemer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Has failed WP:N for 10.23 years. After cleanup and reconstitution, I found little else to support an article, and what I did failed WP:RSP.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessmentsEdit
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class=
parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Was the increase in Russian GDP in 2022 a good thing?Edit
Please comment at Talk:Russia#Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 April 2023 thanks Chidgk1 (talk) 15:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
James MeadeEdit
Hi. For some strange reasons the article about James Meade, an Economics Nobel Prize winner, was missing. I created a stub, but I can't improve it. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 13:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Black Monday (1987) is currently in FAC.Edit
Black Monday (1987) is currently in FAC. § Lingzhi (talk) 22:04, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect graphs for Externality pageEdit
I believe that the two graphs for positive and negative production externalities are incorrect, but I'm not too familiar with economics. A second opinion, and a review of the two remaining graphs would be appreciated. I've removed it for now, and the relevant diff is here: Externality: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Thanks! ARandomName123 (talk) 15:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I've added an {{expert needed}} tag to this article due to major citation issues. Please see the talk page. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)