This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
I am going to review this, though may get confused at parts since I'm used to taking on traditional song articles. --K. Peake 08:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Many thanks. I guess it's traditional in most senses, though with spoken sections it's a little unusual. Happy to help in any way I can. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Your welcome and if I have not understood anything properly below, don't feel afraid to make me aware... good luck! --K. Peake 11:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
"during the eighteenth century." → "during the 17th century." per MOS:NUM and because you mentioned years in the 1700s before
That would simply be misleading, the 17th century began in 1600. I've said "in Bellman's time.
Sorry that was a typo, I do know that each century is actually one ahead of the multiple of 100 so write during the 18th century. --K. Peake 21:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done, but "and" in a heading is a retrograde step really.
Remove wikilink on Stockholm for the img
Done.
"no. 65, "So I look out at the shore", which includes the lines" → "no. 65 "So I look out at the shore", which includes the lyrics:"
Done.
"dramatic technique, the ability" → "dramatic technique; the ability" if this ability is the technique
The ability is the technique, but the semicolon doesn't work as it must introduce a clause with an active verb.
Are you sure a colon isn't the appropriate way to do this? --K. Peake 21:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
I'm perfectly happy to use a colon in such a context, but a hundred gnomish editors "know" otherwise. If you want to use your "minor edits" rights as reviewer to change it I won't object.
Well we could, but it's "the gospel of brandy-drinking" so perhaps the link would be a bit of an Easter Egg!
"but just one of" → "but merely one of"
Done.
"all Stockholm depicters."" → "all Stockholm depicters"." per MOS:QUOTE and this is one sentence, so merge with the above para which it has relevancy to
Done.
"Soundscape, it suggests, turns" → "According to the society, the soundscape turns"
It's better as it is.
Merge the Haga-Brunnsviken Nytt sentence with the above para per short length
Done.
The last performance shows notability per the costume, but actual info is needed for the others to meet WP:SONGCOVER
Fixed, adding description.
Merge the tour company para with the above one, as both are about legacy
Copyvio score looks dangerously high at 67.9%; cut down quoting from the section to help resolve this
Well, looking at the supposed copyvio, there are two things to say. Firstly, the text is long out of copyright; the only material copied is Bellman's own, along with a short bit of Van Loon's translation; he died in 1944, so he too is out of copyright. Secondly, we need to give the reader a small sample of both prose and verse, and in both cases that would easily pass the fair usage test, even if we needed to apply it which we don't.
Fine, thank you for explaining the lack of copyright breaking.
Make sure all of these are archived by using the tool
This isn't a GA requirement; and most of the sources are books. I've archived Ankarkrona and Bergström just in case.
I'm aware of that, but shouldn't you do it incase the links die so people can read more in the future anyway? --K. Peake 21:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
I think we're ok now, pretty much everything is either a book with "hardcopy" available, or archived.
The Bellman Society → Bellman Society on ref 2 with the wikilink
No, this is the primary text, which WikiSource happens to have copied. It is in no way citing the encyclopedia. The text is of course available in many other places.
Remove or replace ref 25 since my laptop's security gives a firm warning that the site is dangerous
Done, this is a new and probably temporary thing, probably the site has been infected as it's a reputable company of many years' standing (no issue when I added it back in 2016).
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; that went better than I expected! --K. Peake 11:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
