Talk:Step Brothers (film)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Step Brothers (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plot
editThe plot should be a brief summary of the movie, not a spoiler. If the whole movie is revealed, a warning should be placed.63.165.50.227 (talk) 18:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles don't contain disclaimers. See the specific guideline on plot spoilers at Wikipedia:Spoiler. --TS 12:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Sara Majane?
editJust browsing and I didn't see this name in the credits, nor do I see any sources claiming that this person wrote the script. Even a quick Google search shows no reliable sources, nor does the person that added this. Are there any sources? If no one can seemingly provide a source, I'll remove it within 48 hours. --HELLØ ŦHERE 10:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism
editA few weeks ago I looked out this article and it said Roger Ebert gave the film three stars but when I returned to the article today it says that Roger Ebert gave the film one and a half stars. Is this vandalism or did Ebert just change his mind? If he did change his mind this information should be added in the criticism section as well. Thank you.-James Pandora Adams —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.168.57 (talk) 03:28, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- He gave the film 1.5 stars. If it did say three stars, that was vandalism. I've searched back through December edits in taht section and can't find the text. Millahnna (talk) 03:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sBFkfcB8WA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.168.11.155 (talk) 12:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Political group "Boats n' Hoes"
editRegarding the "Political Reception" section of the article. This feels entirely unrelated to the movie, and has very little reason to be present here. I would recommend it be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.77.71.138 (talk) 06:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)