Talk:Soviet destroyer Shaumyan

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet destroyer Shaumyan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 03:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Giving a look. —Ed!^(talk) 03:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)

1. It is reasonably well written:

   Pass External links, dup links and dab links look good. Copyvio detector returns green.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:

   Pass offline references accepted in good faith, with a cursory look on Google finding generally backing up what's written.

3. It is broad in its coverage:

   Suggestions

   • Nothing on 1935-1941 history or location when with the Black Sea fleet?
   • Some further explanation needed on "priorities": "The gun was installed on the new Gnevny-class destroyers but not on Shaumyan due to its weight and the priorities of the Soviet Navy."
   • Strange some engagement have exact numbers of shells fired but much of the early history doesn't. Are the records just generally inconsistent on the Russian post-Barbarossa history?
   • Re: evacuations: Any idea how many soldiers she ferried to safety?
   • Would think the unit cost could see the addition of a {{inflation}} but that's generally up to user preference.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   • Pass No problems there.

5. It is stable:

   • Pass No problems there.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:

   Pass Image tagged PD as appropriate.

7. Other:

   Pass Leaving some suggestions but seeing nothing substantial enough to hold the article up. Thanks as always! —Ed!^(talk) 01:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)