Talk:Sounder (novel)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Jerm in topic Requested move 5 July 2021

Critical reviews edit

This article could also use a section on critical reviews. Rklawton (talk) 00:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Awkward, sounds like a book report edit

"The book tried to described the dog with a very exact looks of Sounder." The sentence before this gives a description of the injured Sounder, in present tense. Following that with a sentence saying the book "tried to describe" is not only redundant, but a change of tense, an interruption in the narrative flow of the plot summary, and contains multiple grammatical errors. 75.172.168.204 (talk) 05:13, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 5 July 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Pages moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 08:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


– No primary topic per pageviews. Move dab page to main title. 162 etc. (talk) 03:40, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:32, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support In ictu oculi (talk) 15:56, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support the film gets more views (3,228) than the novel (981) and although the film is based on the novel there are a number of unrelated meanings such as the pig one. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:39, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. No clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.