Talk:Solarpunk
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Solarpunk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Solarpunk be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 March 2017. The result of the discussion was delete. |
Solarpunk is more than just a literary and artistic movement
editSolarpunk is more than just a literary and artistic movement, it is a lifestyle, clothing fashion style and most importantly a technopolitical manifesto for future human living. Solarpunk is about the here and now, as much as it is about an imagined future. --Dr zoidberg590 (talk) 20:22, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Competing Drafts
editAnomic99 (talk) 00:59, 31 May 2019 (UTC) Hi RoySmith. This is a different draft, mine is linked here.
- So, we've got two competing drafts on the same topic. We're not really set up for that. Perhaps the two of you could talk and figure out which one you want to get reviewed? -- RoySmith (talk) 01:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- The other draft was already declined due to the conflict. It seems to have some good material in it, though is perhaps over-long and over-detailed. I'd encourage users to selectively merge well-sourced content from that draft into this article. Hugsyrup 15:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Already deleted article. Uh..
editWTF. This article already went through deletion, for good reason which seems to be repeated in the creation here... uhhhmm.... did it go through the Request for Undeletion process? Doesn't look like it.. Centerone (talk) 20:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- You appear to be under the misapprehension that a page, once deleted, cannot be recreated without going through RFU. This is simply not correct. There is no value in going through RFU unless an editor wants the old content back to work on, which I presume was not the case here. If you believe that this article is identical to the old one, you can nominate it under CSD G4, otherwise if you believe it merits deletion you can nominate it at AFD and the new article can be assessed on its merits. Hugsyrup 12:37, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Can we at least get the talk page restored? Because the same issues still apply, and the content was valuable. Really don't want to have to have all that repeated again. Centerone (talk) 05:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Resources to be added
editHi, I am Aless and this is the first comment I post on Wikipedia. I don't know anything about coding.
If anybody is able to do it, I believe: 1. A link to The Rebublic of Bees blog post should be added: https://republicofthebees.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/from-steampunk-to-solarpunk/ 2. On Appropedia the sustainable wiki, there is an extensive entrance with lots of links and references about solarpunk https://www.appropedia.org/Solarpunk 3. There should be a reference to Solarpunk: Notes Towards a Manifesto https://hieroglyph.asu.edu/2014/09/solarpunk-notes-toward-a-manifesto/ 4. There should be a reference to Solarpunk: A Reference Guide https://medium.com/solarpunks/solarpunk-a-reference-guide-8bcf18871965 5. On this Tumblr post there is a very extensive list of Solarpunk fiction https://advocateforearth.tumblr.com/post/186138673366/an-introduction-to-solarpunk
5. There should be a reference to A Solarpunk Manifesto, by The Solarpunk Community http://www.re-des.org/a-solarpunk-manifesto/
Thanks a lot!
Alexardov (talk) 23:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)alexardov
- I'm surprised that no one has made the connection to Biophilic Design...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biophilic_design?wprov=sfla1
or Permaculture... 2601:343:C202:CD30:51BE:BC6A:B374:315D (talk) 16:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Permaculture:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permaculture?wprov=sfla1 - Sorry, I've never posted to Wikipedia before... 2601:343:C202:CD30:51BE:BC6A:B374:315D (talk) 16:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Dispute: Is there any evidence for the notability of the solarpunk flag image used?
editI cannot find any evidence online for the notability of the solarpunk flag image used - its only prominence seems to be that it was uploaded to Wikicommons and used in this Wikipedia article. It otherwise would be virtually unknown. There are other solarpunk flag images online created by other artists - why should this particular flag and its artist get the publicity of being included in the Wikipedia page for Solarpunk? Zhanli2012 (talk) 14:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Removed as unsourced. While "notability" might not be the right criterion here, certainly there should be some independent reliable sources linking the flag to the article subject. - Ryk72 talk 07:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Upcoming game grabbing the title
editSaw this on Steams Gamescon feature: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1805110/Solarpunk/
I'd say Lightyear Frontier also qualifies, though perhaps less derivative than ^^ https://store.steampowered.com/app/1677110/Lightyear_Frontier/ 2A02:2121:2C3:2172:BC98:C013:8B0:CA5D (talk) 22:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Film: request to remove text
editThe Film section includes a paragraph remarking on the absence of solarpunk themes in film. Would anyone else endorse removing this section? It doesn't seem to contribute meaningfully to the topic. Andrewrgross (talk) 05:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)