Talk:Snot (band)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editA crying shame that when someone reseaches this band this it what they find. It is my opinion that Lynn started something an influenced so many. His death was not only a huge loss to this typeof music, but his accomplishments should be better noted... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ramey (talk • contribs) 22:15, 1 July, 2006 (UTC).
- So do it. I've noticed your last comment on (hed) pe wasn't exactly the winner of the mature post award, so why don't you try and do something useful by adding to this article, then? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.144.143.9 (talk) 12:48, 5 July, 2006 (UTC)
Are you actually supposed to use the official band bio on a wikipedia article?
Fair use criteria
editThe use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. — Moe ε 14:58, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Sources and genres
editJeffries, Vincent. "Biography of Snot". Allmusic. Retrieved 2008-08-23. - punk metal
Iannini, Tommaso (2003). "Snot". Nu metal (in Italian). Giunti. pp. 78–79. ISBN 8809030516. {{cite book}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(help) - punk rock
Udo, Tommy (2002). Brave Nu World. Sanctuary Publishing. p. 241. ISBN 186074415X. - punk
Iannini, Tommaso (2003). "Snot". Nu metal (in Italian). Giunti. pp. 78–79. ISBN 8809030516. {{cite book}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(help) - "Heavy punk funk"
Sharpe-Young, Garry (2005). New Wave of American Heavy Metal. Zonda Books Limited. p. 283. ISBN 0958268401. {{cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |laydate=
, |separator=
, |trans_title=
, |laysummary=
, |trans_chapter=
, |chapterurl=
, |month=
, and |lastauthoramp=
(help) - punk
McIver, Joel (2001). Slipknot: Unmasked. Omnibus Press. p. 92. ISBN 0711986770. {{cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |laydate=
, |separator=
, |trans_title=
, |laysummary=
, |trans_chapter=
, |chapterurl=
, |month=
, and |lastauthoramp=
(help) - hardcore punk
http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1434320/19981214/snot.jhtml - punk
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/aug/20/snot-reunites-returns-santa-barbara/ - punk
http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=105095 - punk
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-19428402.html - punk
http://www.nme.com/news/pulp/4498 - punk
- Cool sources for Slipknot:Unmasked and NME. MTV, on other hand, describes them as "a funk, punk and metal hybrid" so no need to pick any one of the three. And the Santa Barbara Independent works better as a ref for nu metal; it calls them a "nu metal collective". And the first article at the Boston Herald is actually of Sugar Ray, not Snot. And the Blabbermouth article says "metal/punk rock hybrid". And I do not see the relevance of the last link whatsoever. Munci (talk) 00:00, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Arrested for being naked
editThe guy who came out of the prop toilet naked, was that in masfield or foxborough, ma? Thanks, --Tom (talk) 22:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Band Name
editShouldn't we create a new page for the band named "Tons"? In my mind the band "Snot" finished with the death of the lead singer. When they found a new singer and decided to tour with the old name, that's all fine, but the second they decided to change the name of the group, don't they then split off into a new group? It just seems confusing to people of the band Snot, especially seeing as Tons haven't released any music yet. They are a band in name only right now. Just my thoughts. KoRnOnThEeKoB (talk) 14:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- You don't need to release copies of music in order to be a band. Many bands never release albums or anything like that at all. As for creating a separate article, I can see arguments for and against. Maybe the situation at Warsaw and Joy Division is comparable but more likely the one at Joy Division and New Order. Munci (talk) 23:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with KoRnOnThEeKoB. There should be a separate page for Tons. Tons is not Snot it's a new band with former members of Snot that will continue to play Snot's music along with new songs. Snot had numerous line up changes so I don't think a few past members with a new singer and new band name should be considered Snot. That's like saying Alter Bridge is Creed but they have a new singer and new band name. You could've said the same about Velvet Revolver. 3 of the band members used to be in Guns N Roses. Should they have just called it Guns N Roses but with a different singer and new band name? Alter Bridge and Velvet Revolver both have their own pages separate from Creed and GNR (respectively). I know that Sublime (with Rome) and Alice in Chains have done the same (new singers) but both flat out said this is the same band with a new singer. That's not the case with Tons, Alter Bridge or Velvet Revolver. Once VR gets a new singer, now that Weiland is out, we will see if they decide to keep the same moniker or change it but that's not part of the discussion for now. TheTreborSmada (talk) 22:29 PM 7, October 2010 (EST)
File:Snot band.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
edit
An image used in this article, File:Snot band.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:31, 9 December 2011 (UTC) |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Snot (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080818113959/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=100854 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=100854
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081223014922/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=102395 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=102395
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091123073048/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=130748 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=130748
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:08, 10 December 2017 (UTC)