Talk:Smeller (installation)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Amakuru in topic Requested move 22 March 2019

Title for Smeller

edit

There are some difficulties in finding a fitting title for the Smeller article. The esthetic impact of the structure of Smeller is so significant, that it deceives from its actual purpose: the performance of sequences of distinctive scents in motion. A fitting term in the brackets besides Smeller is necessary to distinguish this article from the Smeller (Nose) article. I thought (scent organ) would be fitting, though it still does not differ enough from the Nose. --Alecsodian (talk) 12:42, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Changed the title from Smeller (scent organ) to Smeller (Electronic Scent Projector). --Alecsodian (talk) 16:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Due to discrepancy I changed the title from Smeller (Electronic Scent Projector) to Smeller (Scent Performance Technology).--Alecsodian 11:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alecsodian (talkcontribs)

Requested move 22 March 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Smeller (installation) per IIO suggestion. There is consensus that it is not primary topic though. The dab page is moved to the base name.  — Amakuru (talk) 21:48, 2 April 2019 (UTC)Reply



Smeller (technology)Smeller – Move the article about the art installation to the base name over the redirect, with a hatnote to Nose. A reader looking for "Smeller" in an encyclopedia is more likely to be looking for the work with this actual name rather than the body part/informal slang. If this is done, delete the existing hatnote at Nose and delete (G14) Smeller (disambiguation). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

For information, the related article Osmodrama which was refused at AFC and then created is now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osmodrama. It may well be that it is notable if other artists can be found but as it stands appears like promotional material for this one artist. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.