This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
re: Siege in 1915
Section begins "In early 1915 the Germans faced extreme thirst, as the dry season was underway and their water sources had been poisoned by cadavers which had been thrown in by French troops." Suggests deliberate, malicious action by French. Could be true, but NEEDS SPECIFIC CITATION to avoid appearance of bias. Contamination could just as easily have been by British, or accidental/environmental. Have changed "poisoned" to "contaminated" and removed ref to French troops. Great article overall.Tomseattle (talk) 10:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
