Talk:Seriously, Dude, I'm Gay

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seriously, Dude, I'm Gay article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Seriously, Dude, I'm Gay has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 17, 2022. (Reviewed version).

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Passed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Seriously, Dude, I'm Gay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 02:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

This is something very, very rare: an article ready out of the gate for GA! You should be very happy with the way this one turned out. I don't have to hold it—it's a straight (no pun intended) pass. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:28, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copy changes edit

These were so minor I went ahead and made them. I'd like to draw the attention of Underclass King to MOS:INOROUT, which accounted for most of the tweaks. I also made it clearer in the lead that the reason for the WGA suit had nothing to do with LGBT representation, which might otherwise be inferred. You might also appreciate my essay User:Sammi Brie/Commas in sentences.

My only other suggestion is that Byram's "TV and the FCC [are] very sensitive right now" comment also has a lot to do with the aftermath of the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show controversy, which presumably would have been self-evident to a reader in 2004. But that's not something to hold up GA.

Other edit

References are archived.
One fair-use publicity image (which is understandable for an unaired TV show!) with alt text.
Earwig turns up mostly quotes; no serious issues.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic