Talk:Selma Bajrami

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Reference to Srebrenica edit

Once and for all, can we please keep political subjects away from the article? The relevance regarding Srebrenica 1995 is that Selma does not celebrate her son's birthday, that is all. It is quite all right to mention the subject and link it but to introduce elements of the chapter onto an article about a folk singer is just provocative and irrelevant. It has nothing to do with denial, and it is not only the Serbian nation that disputes the mainstream media version of events, the bottom of the article shows that a number of scholars and academics from around the world have a different story to tell on the matter. The point is that if we include the off-topic information that was originally inserted, why not go all the way and tell the whole story? We can start by giving demographical information on the town in 1991 and how despite its designation as a safe area by the UN in 1993, it remained a spot that was regularly attacked by Serb forces whilst serving as a launching pad for the ARBiH for atrocities, it never ends but that is why an article exists. So let's keep to the part relevant to the subject's private life if we can. --Oranges Juicy (talk) 11:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Selma Bajrami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply