Talk:Saskatoon freezing deaths

Latest comment: 1 year ago by B3251 in topic New parent article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2020 and 14 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Indigipedia, Averagestudent.ua, Destinychalifoux.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2021 and 9 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HaleyHam.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hypothermia and this special case of titling irregularity

edit

I have to figuratively bite my tongue re the accompanying article's title: instances of death literally by freezing are about as common as hens' teeth; plenty o' people (and probably hens) die of hypothermia, but any associated freezing almost always occurs well after death, as freezing (of pure water) occurs abt 65 Fahr. (and abt 30 Cels.) degrees below blood temp, and "One of the lowest documented body temperatures from which someone with accidental hypothermia has survived is 13.0 °C (55.4 °F)". Thus I suggest that the current title become a redirect. Jerzy (talk) 12:45, 13 March 2018‎ (UTC)Reply

Sources to Consider

edit

https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/canadas-prisons-are-the-new-residential-schools/ http://www.publications.gov.sk.ca/freelaw/Publications_Centre/Justice/Stonechild/Stonechild-FinalReport.pdf https://theconversation.com/remembering-neil-stonechild-and-exposing-systemic-racism-in-policing-128436 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique/article/truthtelling-and-legal-discourse-a-critical-analysis-of-the-neil-stonechild-inquiry/880CDEFB3B42208601C9E6B3FAEA8266 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique/article/from-stonechild-to-social-cohesion-antiracist-challenges-for-saskatchewan/0A89420666875DC7495E656B09143486 https://whenpolicebecomeprey.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by WRLO56 (talkcontribs) 05:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tag questioning the neutrality of this article

edit

The basic premise of this page, that police officers in Saskatoon were responsible for the deaths of some members of the First Nations Community by driving them to remote locations and abandoning them in freezing temperatures, is disputed and is contradicted by available forensic evidence. Attempts to mention this or to provide links to sites such as investigative journalist Candis McLean's page https://whenpolicebecomeprey.com/ , are routinely reverted or deleted. Censorship of this nature is clear evidence that the information in the article is heavily biased and selectively edited. WRLO56 (talk) 06:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

McLean's book is of dubious validity; please read the guidelines in WP:RS. The term 'murder' has a specific legal meaning which cannot be used here. Claims of 'censorship' against a non-governmental entity never do very well; Wikipedia is not obligated to provide full coverage to every statement from every source. DS (talk) 15:18, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Changed "murdered" to "were responsible for the deaths of some". I fail to see how you conclude that McLean's book is of "dubious validity". McLean is an award-winning investigative journalist who had a regular newspaper column at the age of 16. She holds an MA in English, and won a Canadian Radio and Television News Director’s Award for Outstanding Work in the Documentary Field. A documentary based on the book, When Police Become Prey: What Lies Behind “Starlight Tours”, won an audience favourite award at the 2010 New Hope Film Festival. The book is published, and with the exception of interviews with some witnesses who wished to remain anonymous, I believe everything in it is independently verifiable. How, then, did you conclude that the book is of "dubious validity"?WRLO56 (talk) 06:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

It's self-published from a vanity press. "Audience favourite" has no bearing on reliability, and neither does what the author was doing when she was sixteen or what her degree is. If your statements can be independently sourced, then source them properly. If you're not sure whether sources can be used, go to the reliable sources noticeboard. DS (talk) 23:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

SPS Censorship of Wikipedia article

edit

When I read that the SPS censored their controversial "Starlight Tours" on the Wikipedia page, I was both stupefied and angered that a professional police agency like them would stoop so low as to remove an entire section of their Wikipedia page just so that people would not know about their disgusting and vile act of freezing people to death.

-Arsenal Pro 1975, December 5, 2021


Section for Consideration

edit

Could a section on the police response to the outrage over the starlight tours be helpful? This could contextualize the general public response and how the Sask police force shifted in response. - Skyef25 September 1, 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skyef25 (talkcontribs) 19:50, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Potential section about police convictions and public response

edit

Following up to my previous comment, I am proposing a new section be added focusing on the public response and indigenous outrage. This can include more updated convictions and police action taken.

There are sources for consideration on my user page User:Skyef25/be bold Skyef25 (talk) 00:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

2601:2C6:4E00:EAA0:A14E:3CED:572E:C716 (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

You said (here) that the current state of the article is contradicted by the fact that two officers were convicted for their treatment of Darrell Night. However, Night survived, and the officers were convicted for unlawful confinement. This does not contradict the statement that "despite convictions for related offences, no Saskatoon police officer has been convicted specifically for having caused freezing deaths".
Ah, thank you for the clarification Skyef25 23:28, October 3 2022 — Preceding undated comment added 04:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Updates are welcome, although please focus on Saskatoon. DS (talk) 18:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

New parent article

edit

Hello all, I'm popping back in here to say I plan on making an article focusing on police brutality against Indigenous Canadians more broadly, inspired by Police brutality against Native Americans. The overall structure for it is in my sandbox if you would like to take a look and leave any suggestions on my talk page. Skyef25 (talk) 23:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hey, just wanted to note that the wording around average temperatures is a bit strange, maybe consider adjusting the structure so that it phrase "average temperature" appears before noting the temperature and consider adding in the record low afterwards. I tried editing it but I do not have the patience to sort out the formatting issues on my cell so I decided it was best to leave it alone. Otherwise this is a solid article. StuntedShadow (talk) 03:04, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
And my proofreading stinks. StuntedShadow (talk) 03:04, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I recommend making a new section, you just replied to an old section B3251 (talk) 19:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply