Talk:Sambo's Grave

Latest comment: 3 years ago by GrindtXX in topic Hoax? Tourist attraction?

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sambo's Grave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hoax? Tourist attraction? edit

The lack of any contemporary reference suggests the possibility that this has always been a tourist attraction and is therefore possibly a hoax. Is there any earlier reference? Cassandra.

Sadly, at that time the death of a slave or black cabin boy would have been considered unimportant and would not have been reported in any newspapers or books. The grave site is, however, notable in its own right whether you believe the story or not. Richerman (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Lonsdale Magazine article discussing it dates from 1822. If it's a hoax it's a longstanding one. GrindtXX (talk) 19:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Plaque edit

I've just added some information about the main plaque being a modern replica. However, I've been unable to discover much about when and how the original was lost, or when it was replaced with the replica. The smaller explanatory plaque just says the original was "damaged & defaced"; but Pevsner 2009 says it was "shamefully stolen" (so I've put stolen in the article). No dates. The 2005 photo here shows it looking quite weathered, so I'd say it must have been replaced a few years before that; but the attention to detail in the reproduction suggests a modern attitude towards heritage. I'd guess maybe the 1990s. Does anyone have any more info? GrindtXX (talk) 18:58, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply