Talk:Sainte-Trinité, Paris

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Felix Folio Secundus in topic References needed tag

Title

edit

Just wondering, why is this article titled in this slightly odd why ("Ste.-Trinité") when all the other Wikipedias, as well as the church's own website feature the full "Sainte-Trinité" title, which is surely easier? Is this convention? Rob (talk) 16:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Move?

edit

Église de la Sainte-Trinité (Paris)Église de la Sainte-Trinité — No need for qualifier, as is the only article about this French church at the moment. Rob (talk) 20:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article rating

edit

The rating on this article was changed from Stub to Start. However, the Stub tag on the main part of the article was not removed. The definition on the quality scale defines a Stub class article as:

The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.

This article definitely meets that quality level as it is mostly a rough collection information written almost list style. The article is unreferenced which is a definite sign of a Stub article. A Start article has meaningful information that is properly written with citations.

I will place that tag on this article and recommend it be reverted to Stub class on the quality scale.--Morenooso (talk) 07:29, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

References needed tag

edit

Usually when that tag is placed on an article, you do citations as well. To slap a book title as one reference is not the best citation method.--Morenooso (talk) 07:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have changed the rating to Stub; the added reference relates to the information which I added so "unreferenced" is no longer true.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 09:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply