Talk:Saint Luke Drawing the Virgin

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, where it is held

4 copies of this painting exists, all of them can be attributed to Rogier van der Weyden (disputed)

• Boston (the only copy only one mentioned in article)
• Munich Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen, Alte Pinakothek
• Hermitage Museum, Russia [1]
• Bruges Stedelijke Musea, Groeningemuseum [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Шуфель (talk • contribs) 12:52, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

• • The Russian tsar bought the Hermitage version from Willem II of the Netherlands. The Hermitage regards its version as the original and the Boston picture as a copy. But the English Wikipedia is written by the Americans, you know. --Ghirla^-трёп- 13:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Inlines etc

Gathering Victoria's inlines, suggestions, comments;

• Section re Virgin's purity - pgs 8-9 are Purtle?
• R Campin: consolidate w/ background section above
• Re throne: duplication
• Dating based on timber analysis - only 10 years?
• Albrecht Dürer Diary - repetition
• essence of the Virgin - repetition, verbose, trim
• notes, see esp red hats

Ceoil (talk) 11:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Attribution

I'm not going to tag the article while it's on the main page, but quotations:

The painting established van der Weyden as a progenitor and "inventor [of] authoritative models ... at the foundation of Netherlandish art".

requires attribution. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 11:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Removed Ceoil (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Why has this page been protected for week? It makes it impossible for us poor IPs to make any kind of contribution. So much for the encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.198.96 (talk) 11:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saint Luke Drawing the Virgin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141228052540/http://www.hnanews.org/hna/conferences/baltimore/papers/vries.html to http://www.hnanews.org/hna/conferences/baltimore/papers/vries.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)