Talk:Sacramento RT Light Rail
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Sacramento RT Light Rail. |
References
editRef. 9 gives an error message.
96.88.198.77 (talk) 02:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Requested move 21 July 2024
edit
 | It has been proposed in this section that Sacramento RT Light Rail be renamed and moved to SacRT light rail. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Sacramento RT Light Rail → SacRT light rail – Similar format to VTA light rail. The article title is trying to use an abbreviated form of the Sacramento Regional Transit District's name, but it is a bit awkward, and "SacRT" seems to be the common abbreviation the agency refers to themselves as, as well as by everyday people, much in the same way "VTA" is the common abbreviation for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. Furthermore, like the VTA light rail system, it technically doesn't have its own unique branding, so the "light rail" part of the article name aren't proper nouns and thus don't need to be capitalized. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 11:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Per nomination. RickyCourtney (talk) 16:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – While we’re at it, each article title for each of the three lines should also have "Sacramento RT" shortened to "SacRT". OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 19:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)