Talk:SMS Arcona (1902)
![]() | SMS Arcona (1902) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | SMS Arcona (1902) is part of the Light cruisers of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Arcona/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 16:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this soon. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Prose has issues.
"Medusa was capable of a top speed of 21.5 knots (39.8 km/h; 24.7 mph)." - Wrong ship.
"She was built by the AG Weser dockyard in Bremen, laid down in early 1900, launched in December 1900, and commissioned into the High Seas Fleet in July 1901. " conflicts with "Arcona was ordered under the contract name "H" and was laid down at the AG Weser shipyard in Bremen in 1901 and launched on 22 April 1902, after which fitting-out work commenced. She was commissioned into the High Seas Fleet on 12 May 1903". Wrong ship again.
Can we get a fix on this before I go further? I'm sure the rest is fine, I checked it once over already, but this is a problem. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Should all be taken care of, thanks for catching these mistakes. Parsecboy (talk) 11:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Other checks seem good, here is the simplified check list.
- Reliable sources:check
- Prose: Fixed
- Neutral: check
- No edit wars:check
- Images: check, no concerns.
Looks good. Passed. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:08, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Requested move 26 December 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. This should have been a technical request. Parsecboy (talk) 13:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Talk:SMS Arcona → Talk:SMS Arcona (1902) – need to swap Talk:SMS Arcona and Talk:SMS Arcona (1902) Did you know... that you can talk to Dingruogu? 05:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support detached Talk page. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:51, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.