Talk:Rommy Hunt Revson

Latest comment: 1 year ago by LordPeterII in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by LordPeterII (talk) 16:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Scrunchies

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:11, 16 September 2022 (UTC).Reply

  •   Hi Cbl62, review follows; article created 15 September and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I didn't pick up on any overly close paraphrasing from the online sources that I could access; hook fact is interesting and mentioned in the article, unfortunately I don't have a NYT subscription to access the full article but happy to AGF that it supports it (the People article seems to back it up); image is freely and appropriately licensed; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 08:12, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • @Cbl62 and Dumelow: hmmm, I'm not sure the hook does the naming justice. Her poodle was named "Scunci", and it somehow became known as a "scrunchie" as time went on – does that count as the scrunchie being named after her pet poodle? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 00:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
      As I read the sources, Revson marketed her invention as the "Scunci", naming it after her pet poodle, and sold millions of dollars of product under that name. Over time, the product became more broadly and generically known as the scrunchie. If you find the poodle part problematic, I have no objection to pruning the last seven words. Cbl62 (talk) 01:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
      Hi theleekycauldron, my thoughts are similar to those of Cbl62. I don't think it is a problem to use the genericised term (using "Scunci" would confuse the reader) but if necessary, drop the clause about the dog - Dumelow (talk) 06:11, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
      @Cbl62 and Dumelow: maybe "originally named", then? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 20:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm ok either way: (i) purging the pet poodle, or (ii) inserting "originally" before the word "named". Cbl62 (talk) 21:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, either option fine by me also - Dumelow (talk) 07:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

To Prep 1