This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is not a trace of evidence that Edward saw the dispute over the Scottish succession as a means of advancing his ambitions to rule the whole of the British Isles. These ambitions developed in the wake of circumstances. It is important not to read history backwards, so to speak, from outcomes to causes.
There is, unfortunately, a continuing tendency to misread the whole process by which John emerged as king as part of a deeply laid plot by Edward, reflected in this article. This does not accord with the facts. The arbiters most definitely did not stand back while Edward disposed of the kingdom as he would 'with an earldom'. They gave judgement in favour of Balliol in early November, in accordance with all of the precedents of primogeniture: even twenty-nine of Bruce's own auditors voted in favour of Balliol, underlining the strength of his claim. The myth that John Balliol-and it is a myth-was deliberately forced on the Scots as an act of English manipulation was given shape at Robert Bruce's first parliament, held at St. Andrews in 1309.
Rcpaterson 05:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
