Talk:Ridicule (disambiguation)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Red Slash in topic NC
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

NC edit

As per Talk:Ridicule_(film) there is currently no consensus either for or against this page being a disambiguation page versus a redirect to mockery. Red Slash 17:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Red Slash, I think that most of the support votes were for "ridicule" redirecting to the Mockery article. I don't understand why you opted for a disambiguation page. I didn't see any solid arguments that readers would be looking for the other listings on the disambiguation page besides the film. I don't know whether to start a close review or an RfC. For now, I'll ping the editors who voted "support" so that they can reaffirm or clarify their positions if they hadn't already: Bungle, GrindtXX, In ictu oculi, PC78, Crouch, Swale, Eventhorizon51, *Trekker, Crossroads1, SmokeyJoe, BD2412, Erik, and Narky Blert. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Yes I will clarify that I support this page being redirect to mockery.★Trekker (talk) 19:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
My position has always been that "ridicule" should redirect to mockery per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. At the top of that we can mention the film; the other things on this page won't be looked for under the word ridicule so no need to mention them. -Crossroads- (talk) 19:49, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Okay, Red Slash, looking at the discussion again, I see how you felt there was no consensus about whether or not the base name should be a disambiguation page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the ping. IMO: Ridicule should redirect to Mockery as WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. Narky Blert (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Also concur that ridicule should redirect to mockery. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 20:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • I absolutely agree that ridicule should redirect to mockery. I created mockery as a target to encompass all synonyms for the concept. It might not be as heavily visited because it is actually a fairly new page, as an article, but that is its purpose. bd2412 T 20:12, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
I perhaps have a slight preference over Ridicule being the DAB although I have sympathy for associating directly with mockery. The terms are often used interchangeable and for me I could not sway one way or the other sufficiently enough to declare a clear support position. The only thing I felt clear on was that the film shouldn't have occupied the primary article title. Bungle (talkcontribs) 20:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Would prefer a redirect to mockery, and this being (disambiguation), but whatever, great improvement over previous situation. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Per the above, BOLDLY implementing this. It's the right outcome. bd2412 T 01:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Given that the film gets more views I think a DAB page is probably the best option even though Mockery is clearly primary by PT#2. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Go for it. I was hoping for a discussion on this that would lead to a speedy resolution. Red Slash 17:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply