A fact from Richard Laurence Marquette appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 May 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
It sure doesn't look like one. More like user-submitted content with no editorial oversight. And some of the things it says about Marquette directly contradict A Rose for Her Grave which was written by a professional crime writer known for her thorough research into the subjects she writes about. It barely even mentions the Wilson murder and claims he will one day be eligible for parole. I don't think we should trust it as a source. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I completely agree. It is not a Reliable Source.Tkotc (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I have to wonder if a person who commits a second murder thirteen years after the first is really a "serial" killer. Yes, the second and third killings were in short order, but two does not a series make, and the other one (the first) is so distant that it seems to stretch definitions a whole lot to include it in a "series".--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:37, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
On the contrary, Marquette meets the definition of a serial killer in every way. He is pretty much a perfect example of a person who committed a series of murders over a period of time, with space between each murder, who killed because of an abnormal psychological condition. Strangling and chopping up your dates is not exactly normal and shows a unique signature that ties the murders to an underlying psychological need. People who commit a bunch of murders one after the other are spree killers. Keep in mind that a large part of the reason for the long time frame between the first and second murders is that he was in jail for 11 years. Their aren't any women to kill in prison, and the guards tend to notice if you spend all day chopping up a dead body in your cell. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:42, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
