This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've been reverting the attempt to add a statement in the introduction that the term is derogatory and racist. Such a claim would require a citation, at least to published opinion pieces that the term is problematic, rather than a personal opinion on the matter. As far as I can tell the term is not racist, being used mainly by Native Americans themselves and in Native American-related publications, nor is it derogatory even to the dog. There seems to be an affection for the dogs, and their image as down-and-out survivors. The term "rez" is a common informal abbreviation for reservation, again used mostly by people who live there or have some connection. The only questionable issue, I think, is the implication that reservations have a lot of dogs on them, something that is probably true historically but perhaps not the image a modern reservation may want to have. Anyway, if opposition to this term is a real thing that too would be an interesting thing to cover in the article. - Wikidemon (talk) 19:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
So uh...Does this article apply exclusively to post-colonial dogs or Native American village dogs in general? 'Cuz if it was the latter, we could really fix up this article into something good.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
"The distinction between a reservation dog and American dogs in general" what, in this context, is an American dog? Is it a breed bred in North America? Is it any dog living within North America? Is it differenciating between dogs living on a reservation (regardless of breed origins) compared to dogs with indigenous American origins? Wacape (talk) 04:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
_part_2.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}