Talk:Revolutionary movement for Indian independence

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2409:4063:231C:3D7F:6248:2464:BBB5:6475 in topic Revolution in British-India?

Incomplete edit

It is incomplete,it deserves 3 out of 5.Not enough information,not enough pictures,and so more.Ovsek (talk) 05:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Revolution in British-India? edit

In a nation with 37 crore (370 million) people (Pakistan, India & Bangladesh), a handful of people indulging in acts of terror is not any people's revolution. They are just miscreant. Rich people from the subcontinent going to England and declaring themselves as the leaders of the 'Indian' people, is just being cunning. 3 million native soldiers supporting the English rule, and along with millions of common people. And on the other side, a few rich guys claiming themselves as the leaders of the people. It needs a lot of manipulated imagination to believe in the fake story of Indian independence movement.

are british is now good or bad 2409:4063:231C:3D7F:6248:2464:BBB5:6475 (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Savarkar, A Revolutionary? edit

There is no evidence that Vinayak Damodar Savarkar was a revolutionary of any sort during British rule in India. In fact, the evidence points to the contrary. Please remove him from the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.246.32.210 (talk) 04:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

What makes you such a thing? You have read his biography article and the article on India House, Madame Cama, Madanlal Dhingra, Hem Chandra Das Senapati Bapat etc?rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 09:36, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Revolutionary movement for Indian independence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply