Untitled

edit

In the opening para, the word dasas is used and it may not be intelligible for a general reader. Also, it is best to replace "immeasurable" to considerable in the same opening para.--Aadal (talk) 23:41, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

RFC on reliability

edit

Per RFC at Carnatic music article - there has been an apparent synthesis of thought, as well as use of unreliable sources to purport the patently false claim that Purandaradasa was called the father of Carnatic music because he founded the music system as it is today. Naadapriya has however insisted that this is a true claim based on reliable sources, despite the fact Purandaradasa was called the father of Carnatic music because he founded the system of teaching Carnatic music as it is known today. I've opened this RFC in the hope of settling this through the appropriate dispute resolution channel. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:17, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your own interpretation (he was a pioneer in pedagogy, not of the genre itself) is also unreferenced. But your complaint has some merit. E.g., of six references offered by Naadapriya, only one passes the criteria set down at WP:RS. The whole article was very subjectively written -- terribly immature prose. Nevertheless, it was basically substantial; after I cleaned it up, there was a lot of substance left. Hurmata (talk) 02:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ncmvocalist, in English to call someone the "father" or "mother" of something (like "rock and roll") means they created it, not merely enhanced it or popularized it. But it occurs to me that this may not be the interpretation in every other language. Beyond that argument, it seems to me there were some sources (maybe not among the "reliable" ones, I'm not bothering to check at the moment) that referenced a Kannada term that they translate as either "father" or "grandfather" of Carnatic music. Now, if the natives himself call Purandara "the father of", then how can you justify not quoting that? The only way that I can imagine would be if you could substantiate that the metaphor does mean something different to the Kannadigas. Hurmata (talk) 06:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hurmata, in the English Wikipedia, we do not synthesise material, particularly when there is evidence to support the fact that the entire genre of music existed prior to Purandaradasar even being born. It's not disputed he's called the father of Carnatic music, primarily, for formulating the system of teaching Carnatic music which is still adopted. That does not equate to an exceptional unsupported claim that he created the entire genre of music as it is known today. Exceptional claims need exceptional sourcing, and that's what it comes down to. Reliable sources are a non-negotiable requirement, and if you can't be bothered checking, why are you here? You're not helping. This point is being settled at the RFC on the Carnatic music talk page. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:13, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edit

edit

Link to reference "10^ Official website by Government of Karnataka http://www.dasasahitya.org (in Kannada language)" is not working. Going to a spam page. Please edit appropriately or remove this reference. Apparaokr (talk) 02:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Done. Ncmvocalist (talk) 06:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


Pending changes

edit

This article is one of a number (about 100) selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.

The following request appears on that page:

Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Penfding changes" would be appreciated.

Please update the Queue page as appropriate.

Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially

Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 23:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC).Reply

Edit request from M.adityaram, 11 November 2010

edit

{{edit semi-protected}} It has been mentioned that satya dharma theertaru were pontiff of vyasa thirtha matha which is incorrect. Sri Satya Dharma Theertaru belonged to Uttaradhi Matha.

M.adityaram (talk) 03:47, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 04:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Kannada text for reference

edit
  • Kannada text of his Keertana
  • For reference:

ಆದದ್ದೆಲ್ಲ ಒಳಿತೆ ಆಯಿತು

  • Aadaddella oLitE aayitu)
  • Kannada version in en-letters)
  • ರಚನೆ: ಶ್ರೀ ಪುರಂದರದಾಸರು
  • ರಾಗ : ಪಂತುರಾವಳಿ ; ತಾಳ : ಆದಿತಾಳ

-

  • ಆದದ್ದೆಲ್ಲ ಒಳಿತೆ ಆಯಿತು ನಮ್ಮ
  • ಶ್ರೀಧರ ಸೇವೆ ಮಾಡಲು ಸಾಧನ ಸಂಪತ್ತಾಯಿತು;

-

  • ದಂಡಿಗೆ ಬೆತ್ತ ಹಿಡಿಯೊದಕ್ಕೆ
  • ಮಂಡೆ ಮಾಚಿ ನಾಚುತಲಿದ್ದೆ
  • ಹೆಂಡತಿ ಸಂತತಿ ಸಾವಿರವಾಗಲಿ
  • ದಂಡಿಗೆ ಬೆತ್ತ ಹಿಡಿಸಿದಳಯ್ಯ

-

  • ಗೋಪಾಳ ಬುಟ್ಟಿ ಹಿಡಿಯೊದಕ್ಕೆ
  • ಭೂಪತಿಯಂತೆ ಗರ್ವಿಸುತಿದ್ದೆ
  • ಆ ಪತ್ನೀ ಕುಲ ಸಾವಿರವಾಗಲಿ
  • ಗೋಪಾಳ ಬುಟ್ಟಿ ಹಿಡಿಸಿದಳಯ್ಯ

-

  • ತುಳಸಿ ಮಾಲೆ ಹಾಕುವುದಕ್ಕೆ
  • ಅರಸನಂತೆ ನಾಚುತಲಿದ್ದೆ
  • ಸರಸಿಜಾಕ್ಷ ಪುರಂದರ ವಿಠ್ಠಲ
  • ತುಳಸಿ ಮಾಲೆ ಹಾಕಿಸಿದನಯ್ಯ

-

References

  1. ^ Text from -'Purandaradasara PadagaLu'collection by G.V.Shastri MA.Bed; Paruprakashana Gadaga. (free from Copyight)

Meaning of terminology

edit

daatu varase not tattu varase because "daatu" in Kannada means to cross or move from one to the next. In effect what daatu varase does is to cross from one set of swaras to the next. Errors of this nature result from the limitation of Tamil language where ta and da are written using the same script. Also, vaaggeyakara means composer not performer. The original word although derived from Sanskrit, is used in Kannada as well. Abridged Kannada-English dictionary, published by Kannada Sahitya Parishat, Pampa Mahakavi Road, Chamarajapet, Bangalore 560018, 2006. KrishnaRaghu (talk) 16:17, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Purandara.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Purandara.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Purandara.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image — Preceding unsigned comment added by CommonsNotificationBot (talkcontribs) 20:19, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Purandara.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Purandara.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Purandara.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image — Preceding unsigned comment added by CommonsNotificationBot (talkcontribs) 18:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Purandara Dasa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk09:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment: Please save this nomination until 2 January 2021 so it can be on the main page for his Death Day!

5x expanded by Materialscientist (talk) and MRRaja001 (talk). Nominated by MRRaja001 (talk) at 17:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC).Reply

  Sigh, this is a fine detailed article but I see no 5-times expansion over 7 days before nominating, and many paragraphs are without citation. The set for 2 January is already made. My recommendation: source the remainder of the article and nominate as Good article (WP:GA) in November 2021 for 2 January 2022. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:29, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Gerda Arendt: I will start working on article and nominate to WP:GA. - MRRaja001 (talk) 09:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
That's great. Will you do that soon, or should we close this and you nominate again when approved? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Gerda Arendt: Okay, I'll nominate the DYK after the article becoming GA, Thank you. - MRRaja001 (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  close per above --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply