Talk:Punit Renjen

Infobox image

On behalf of Deloitte, I am requesting the addition of File:Punit Renjen.jpg to the article's infobox. Deloitte has already submitted a permissions email to OTRS, but the permissions hasn't been updated yet. The image just needs to be added to the infobox, but I'd prefer not to edit the article directly due because of my COI. Is someone willing to add an image to this unillustrated article on my behalf? @Omni Flames: Would you be interested, since you accepted the article at AfC? Inkian Jason (talk) 16:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

@Inkian Jason:  Done Omni Flames (talk) 22:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

@Omni Flames: Thank you very much! Inkian Jason (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit request to undo vandalism

Is there an editor who is willing to revert this vandalism? I prefer not to edit articles in the main space directly, but wanted to point this out so another editor can help. Thanks! @Fylbecatulous: You helped with a similar request here. Is this something you'd be willing to correct? Inkian Jason (talk) 18:08, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

 Done. Honestly, I can't imagine any Wikipedian having a problem with paid editors reverting obvious vandalism – see WP:COIU. You have my blessing if you want to revert vandalism in mainspace going forward. Altamel (talk) 04:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Good morning, Inkian Jason, thank you for the request ping. Happy you were rescued before I could get on and see your plea for help and revert. I absolutely agree. Please do not let vandalism stay in an article until another editor can come along and revert. I trust your ability to recognise a detrimental edit in any of the work that you are watching. Do not fret while the article is in disrepair. Continued best wishes.  :) Fylbecatulous talk 11:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! Inkian Jason (talk) 17:07, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

More vandalism

Resolved

@Fylbecatulous: Might you be willing to revert the recent vandalism to this article, since you were able to help before? I still prefer not to edit this article directly. This diff shows the net changes made on October 11 (there is an odd edit in between, too). Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 15:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Inkian Jason, thank you for the ping. I restored the version in history from September 10. I could not find any name in either source citation from the edit by the new editor, so I also warned them for failure to provide a reliable source. The son's name is not important in context for a business article. Thank you as always, Fylbecatulous talk 01:37, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Fylbecatulous, thanks again for your help. Inkian Jason (talk) 15:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

@Fylbecatulous: Would you be willing to revert this most recent edit? Inkian Jason (talk) 15:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Never mind, the problem has been addressed. Thanks, Inkian Jason (talk) 19:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

... and again...

@Atvelonis: Thanks for reverting the vandalism. Do you mind taking another look? Someone keeps vandalizing this article, but I don't make direct edits given my conflict of interest. Inkian Jason (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

@Inkian Jason: I'll keep an eye on the page, no problem. —Atvelonis (talk) 00:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. Inkian Jason (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

@Atvelonis: You might consider reverting this recent edit, too. Thanks, Inkian Jason (talk) 17:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Reverted, thanks for the heads up. —Atvelonis (talk) 18:47, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks again, Inkian Jason (talk) 22:10, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

@Atvelonis: Once again. Inkian Jason (talk) 22:09, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Reverted. :) —Atvelonis (talk) 23:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@Atvelonis: Thanks, but the content has already been added back. Inkian Jason (talk) 21:35, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Mmm, looks like I was beaten to the punch by an anon. Strange that the vandal is still bothering with this though, most seem to lose interest after like two edits. —Atvelonis (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Atvelonis: ClueBot reverted once, but might you be wiling to revert the most recent edit as well? One editor seems to enjoy vandalizing this article. Inkian Jason (talk) 17:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Reverted! —Atvelonis (talk) 03:07, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. Inkian Jason (talk) 17:07, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

@Atvelonis: Yet again. Inkian Jason (talk) 15:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Fixed. —Atvelonis (talk) 16:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Edit request to update Career and Awards sections

On behalf of Deloitte, I am requesting two updates to this page. Because of my employment by Deloitte, I prefer not to make the edits directly but instead request that another editor please review/approve these changes. In the Career section, 3rd paragraph – replace last sentence with these two suggested sentences: “In 2022, Deloitte announced that their fiscal year revenue reached $59.3 billion and their workforce expanded to 415,000.[17] Deloitte was the first big 4 firm to clear $50 billion in global revenue.”[18]” The new citation for footnote [17] would be: https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2022/09/08/deloitte-revenues-hit-record-on-back-of-tech-consulting-boom/ The 2nd update is to please add two new recognitions at the end of the Awards and honors section. The following could be added to the end of the last sentence: “and honored by the Carnegie Corporation of America as one of 34 “Great Immigrants. Great Americans.”[48] Most recently, he was ranked #6 among the Top 100 CEOs on Brand Finance’s Brand Guardianship Index 2023.[49]” Here are the links for new footnotes [48] and [49], respectively: https://www.carnegie.org/awards/award/great-immigrants/ and https://brandirectory.com/reports/brand-guardianship-index-2023 Thank you -- Matthew at Deloitte (talk) 16:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

@Omni Flames, would you be willing to review these suggested edits and potentially help with this? I prefer not to edit this page directly due to my acknowledged COI. I see above that you made edits to this page some time back. Thanks. Matthew at Deloitte (talk) 14:14, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Update request - appointment to President's Export Council

On behalf of Deloitte, I am requesting another update to this page. Because of my employment by Deloitte, I prefer not to make the edits directly -- instead I’m asking that another editor please review/approve this update. In the first section, 3rd paragraph, I suggest adding this recent appointment: “In 2023, Renjen was appointed to President Biden’s Export Council.”

Here’s a citation for this update: Source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/02/28/president-biden-announces-key-appointments-to-boards-and-commissions-is18/

@Atvelonis, I see that you have edited this page in the past. Would you please consider helping with this update? Thank you, Matthew at Deloitte (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)