Talk:Principle (disambiguation)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Favonian in topic Requested move
 | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
Requested move edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 18:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Principle (disambiguation) → Principle – The article Principle is a poor dicdef article which first gives a dictionary definition, and then gives an awkward list of some principles, and no references, too. The subject is perfectly covered by the disambiguation page, similar to Guidance, Directorship, etc.Staszek Lem (talk) 15:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Comment – this request is not well formed until you say what you propose to do with Principle. If you want it to disappear, you probably need to take it to AfD. If you want to move it or merge it, you need to say where. Dicklyon (talk) 23:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- OK: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principle. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:17, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy procedural close this move is dependent on an AfD, so can never be implemented without the AfD passing, if this is supported, but the AFD fails, then this will automatically fail regardless. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- That's not really how we handle simultaneous RMs and AfDs (the simplest solution is to not close the RM while the AfD is open), and besides, the AfD has been closed as speedy keep. --BDD (talk) 17:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keeping at the AfD means this request automatically fails, since it is dependent on the other article not existing (there's no point to move this to "Principle (something else)"). And if the other article doesn't exist, then it is a simple technical move for a malplaced dab page. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- That's not really how we handle simultaneous RMs and AfDs (the simplest solution is to not close the RM while the AfD is open), and besides, the AfD has been closed as speedy keep. --BDD (talk) 17:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.