Talk:Portland Trail Blazers

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Portland Trail Blazers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Portland Trail Blazers was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 1, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
January 4, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
April 2, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed
July 11, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
July 5, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

National Basketball Association Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Basketball Association, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NBA on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Basketball AssociationWikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationTemplate:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationNBA articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Top‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

This article was a Collaboration of the Week/Month for WikiProject Oregon November 4–November 12, 2007.

Schrempf

I didn't really feel Schrempf belonged in the Not to be Forgotten section considering he played barely 100 games for the Blazers in two seasons, averaging maybe 6ppg... if you include him you'd have to include just about everyone who ever played for the team. Sarge Baldy 14:51, May 12, 2004 (UTC)

Ime Udoka

In the roster template he has a Nigerian flag next to his name. He was born in Portland so he's not really an international player. If no one has anything against that I'll change it.

he played for the nigerian team in the world basketball finals so yeah

Why is this article so boring?

This article should talk about Bill Walton, Clyde Drexler and the culture of Blazermania. Why isn't there a Wikipedia entry for Blazermania? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.201.133 (talk • contribs)

Issues with article

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This 2008 article has significant uncited material (see the History and Front office sections) while the History section is overwhelmingly biased towards recent events. If these issues aren't fixed, a GAR may be necessary. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

Latest comment: 21 hours ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Portland Trail Blazers

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Numerous uncited paragraphs, bloated sections and a bias towards recent events. Z1720 (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Deni Avdija

Latest comment: 8 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should roster be upgraded to reflect the trade? MaskedSinger (talk) 20:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic