| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Polikarpov I-3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Polikarpov I-3 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 4, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that initial deliveries of the Polikarpov I-3 in 1929 were to units in the Belorussian Military District, where they replaced the Grigorovich I-2? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
.png)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Polikarpov I-3/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose:
(MoS):
- prose:
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Putting this on hold for a short while. As you only need to fix a few things.
- Pass/Fail: Putting this on hold for a short while. As you only need to fix a few things.
Comments edit
1. aircraft completed with the. Suggest - aircraft were completed with the
- Good catch.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)