Talk:Pharaoh's daughter (wife of Solomon)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image copyright problem with Image:Kebra Nagast.jpg
editThe image Image:Kebra Nagast.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Other Daughters of Pharoah married to Jewish Biblical Figures
editWhile this wikipedia article is very informative, the scholarship seems to claim that Solomon's marriage to a daughter of Pharaoh was unique in biblical literature. In that, it ignores the account of the patriarch Abraham's marriage / concubinage relationship with Hagar, who by Rabbinic tradition was also a daughter of Pharaoh. (cf. Genesis 16:1, Rashi adloc., Yonatan Ben Uziel (sic) adloc., Bereishit Rabbah 45:1) 24.185.8.28 (talk) 14:17, 1 November 2010 (UTC)Baruch
- I think you are interpreting things incorrectly. It is unique in scripture. Midrash & specifically the B'reshith Rabba are not scripture and shouldn't be given that much weight. Answers provided in midrash are by scribes living long after the facts and they were attempting to fill in the blanks where they didn't know the answers. That rabbinic tradition has no merit or basis in the scripture.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 18:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Possible bias in sources
editI find it a tad difficult to believe that a website called infidels.com could be objective and as such I would much appreciate if there were another source verifying its information. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.200.115.29 (talk) 22:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Section "Naming the Pharaoh"
editThis section gives popular theories from several sources including Egyptologists and the Catholic Church. It ignores however one compelling theory that warrants mention. The Egyptologist David Rohl in his book "A Test of Time: The Bible—from Myth to History" (London: Century. ISBN 0-7126-5913-7) puts forth the idea that the Pharaoh is Horemheb. This Pharaoh actually did marry off daughters for political reasons. This fact is attested to by a hieroglyphic inscription on an alabaster vase found in the place of King Nikmaddu of Ugarit during the 1952 excavation season (A. Curtis, Ugarit Cities of the Biblical World, Cambridge 1985 pp 44-45). Text regarding this theory should be added to this section. Ffejmopp (talk) 21:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pharaoh's daughter (wife of Solomon)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
---|---|
Congratulations on a great article and amazing job (and in only two days!). I am rating this B class and was tempted to say A class. Nominating the article for Did you know... on the Wikipedia Main Page and the steps for at least a B class biography may be helpful. A few of the lengthy quotations may stop a reader from following the narrative. Is it possible to cut some of the longer quotes in favor of your own words? Also are there any Web sites that could be in an External links section? A gallery or a library or some other resource might bring the story into the present day. Minor points, what about moving the Note for Jewish Publication Society to a Reference section by itself? Also I don't know the rules for punctuation inside quotes, but as there were examples of both I chose inside. Apologies in advance if there is a Wikipedia rule to the contrary. The story and illustrations, the divisions into sections, and the citations are really well done. Best wishes. -Susanlesch 19:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 19:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 02:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The Harem of Amenhotep III
editI've like to see a justification for this comment?
"it included a princess from each of the seven nations listed in 1 Kings 11:1"
What I've read about Amenhotep's Wives elsewhere includes only Hittie wives. And even that is iffy since I question those HItties being he Biblical ones placed near Hebron. BUt the greater point is I've no references to him having wives from Sidon/Tyre, Edom, Moab or Ammon.--JaredMithrandir (talk) 10:47, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
We do not have a full list of the harem of Amenhotep III, but it may have been extensive by Egyptian standards.:
"Amenhotep III is known to have married several foreign women:
- Gilukhepa, the daughter of Shuttarna II of Mitanni, in the tenth year of his reign.[1]
- Tadukhepa, the daughter of his ally Tushratta of Mitanni, Around Year 36 of his reign.[2][3]
- A daughter of Kurigalzu, king of Babylon.[3]
- A daughter of Kadashman-Enlil, king of Babylon.[3]
- A daughter of Tarhundaradu, ruler of Arzawa.[3]
- A daughter of the ruler of Ammia (in modern Syria).[3]
Gilukhepa was accompanied by "317 women" when she entered the harem.
- That's all what I'd read already. That lack any direct overlap with the wives of Solomon. In fact even this article's claim he married a daughter of Tuthmosis IV seems out of date with what we know now.--JaredMithrandir (talk) 01:22, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
If the princess in question is Sitamun, she is more likely a daughter of Amenhotep III rather than his sister. Dimadick (talk) 10:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)