This article was nominated for deletion on August 11, 2017. The result of the discussion was delete.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just a reminder that WP:NACTOR is not automatically passed just because an actor has had roles — it is passed only when an actor has received enough reliable source coverage about him in media to fulfill WP:GNGfor having had roles. I'm not going to shoot this on sight this time, but will offer it time to improve — but I do need to point out that this version is not making a stronger NACTOR claim (which, again, requires more than just "has had roles"), or citing stronger sourcing to actually get over NACTOR, than the first version did, and it will be vulnerable to redeletion if the sourcing doesn't see timely improvement. Bearcat (talk) 23:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Career section says “Hynes's first role was Andy Strucker, a mutant in the X-Men-derived Fox TV pilot The Gifted”. This seems to be directly contradicted by the Filmography section, which shows several roles before The Gifted. (I removed the statement, but my edit was reverted, so I’m bringing it up here). Wednesday90 (talk) 17:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments5 people in discussion
Recently, Percy was accused of sexual assault by many people and there’s nothing in the article about that. Should there be a wait for more information, or write what has happened so far? Klee Bakudan (talk) 06:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Is there any legal accusation? If not, it should not be in the lemma. Anybody can *allege* anyone of distasteful or even criminal behavior. Particularly 'famous people' are vulnerable to smear campaigns in social media. A legal accusation of a criminal act is quite a different category, as it requires probable cause as established by a judge. So that is where I would draw the line. In my view, people on Twitter claiming that X did 'bad stuff' or even 'very bad stuff' is not serious enough to include in encyclopedic articles. Mcouzijn (talk) 23:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
It has actually been proven by further tweets by the accusers that he did not do those things, that he may be associated with people who did. I suggest looking at these Twitter threads of people who dug deeper in to the accusations.
Latest comment: 11 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please remove Source 1. It is not credible, as the author did not research nor interview the actor. The article from Collider is not an informative article nor a respected journalist site. 2601:41:C401:3330:8174:1D3A:32EF:6DBB (talk) 03:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Done - looks like this just didn't get closed. Tollens (talk) 04:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply