Talk:Party and play

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Party and play article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Party and play. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Party and play at the Reference desk.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Culture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improvements --- Relate These Articles and Remove The Homophobic Bias That is Apparent in the Current Version edit

There has been recent coverage that relates to the non-existent factors of dangers involving methamphetamines as it relates to drug use.

Many of these articles are part of the Tedx talk serious ---- Ideas Worth Sharing.

But there is a constant "click" of persons here that have a homophobic agenda to hold this information in this article hostage from the truth.

Time and time again, there can't be fair reporting, and Centerpoint views as this article in its current stage are blatantly wrong.

Let Overview the TedX Talks When it comes to all drugs. Also, realize that the Portugal model of decriminalization is factoring in that when they changed their system, which had the highest incident of intravenous drug abuse is the world, [ before the change ], after the change, a 90% reduction in the number of HIV Infections occurred. I wish this article would reflect the truth and stop the bias that is more to less killing people from being sheltered from better options of thought.

^[1] 6 incredible things that happened when Portugal decriminalized all drugs Drake Baer Apr 26, 2016, 9:47 AM

^[2] ted everything you think you know about addiction is wrong

Forbes Magazine [ Respectful? ]: ^[3] 449,740 viewsNov 4, 2013, 08:00am Everything You've Heard About Crack And Meth Is Wrong Jacob Sullum

^[4] Psychology Today [ Respectful? ]

Stanton Peele Ph.D. Addiction in Society Normalizing Drug Use Drug use does not become and remain addictive more often than other involvements Posted Apr 25, 2014

Also

^[5]

Stanton Peele Ph.D. Addiction in Society

Normalizing Drug Use America's focus is on eliminating drug use—we need to regulate and manage it Posted Jan 17, 2017

Is that enough citations for you all to get your teeth into talking about this matter to correct this article?

11:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)Gruwup2 (talk)Gruwup2 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace

Sources edit

2020 study edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just read this Danish article about this study. I don't have access to the actual study, so someone else will have to check if it is relevant in the article. Palnatoke (talk) 09:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Risks" section seems off/biased edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The risks section does not read like a wiki article. Could this be cleaned up, removing biased/PSA-type language and adding more sources?

-- Sparklex (talk) 12:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I removed a good sized chunk that was in violation of G11. I would have tried to improve it but it was beyond my skill. Computerbone (talk) 17:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

wilton manors Methamprescript edit

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

federal funding - biochemist -Prescription scipts - historyscientistatistics

recreational 73.179.67.128 (talk) 11:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] ttps://www.businessinsider.com/what-happened-when-portugal-decriminalized-all-drugs-2016-3

[2] ttps://www.ted.com/talks/johann_hari_everything_you_think_you_know_about_addiction_is_wrong?language=en

[3] ttps://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2013/11/04/everything-youve-heard-about-crack-and-meth-is-wrong/

[4] ttps://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/addiction-in-society/201404/normalizing-drug-use

[5] ttps://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/addiction-in-society/201701/normalizing-drug-use

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]