Talk:Park Jung-hwan (footballer)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Havelock Jones in topic Requested move 24 October 2021

Requested move 24 October 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved.

3 editors support the move and 1 opposes. WP:TWODABS tells us that we don't need a DAB page here: the non-primary topic still needs to be disambiguated from the primary topic. I find a consensus that the hyphen is insufficient for this purpose and therefore that the article should be moved.(non-admin closure) Havelock Jones (talk) 19:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


Park Jung-hwanPark Jung-hwan (footballer) – This footballer and the Go player Park Junghwan have the same name. The hyphen does not reliably distinguish them. Between the two, the Go player should be considered the primary topic, both by page views and significance. The footballer should be moved as the WP:ONEOTHER. Adumbrativus (talk) 07:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook(talk) 03:21, 2 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 17:51, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per WP:TWODABS. Hatnotes sufficient. GiantSnowman 17:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment, if it wasn't clear enough why the hyphen does not reliably distinguish them: The Go player's name is more commonly rendered as "Park Junghwan" in English, but practices vary among English-language sources, and some write "Park Jung-hwan" (e.g. [1]). The current naming of the two articles fails WP:PRECISION. Adumbrativus (talk) 00:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.