Talk:Operation Sandblast

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 13, 2010WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 3, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Operation Sandblast was the code name for the first submerged circumnavigation of the world executed by the USS Triton in 1960?
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 25, 2011, April 25, 2014, April 25, 2019, April 25, 2020, April 25, 2021, April 25, 2023, and April 25, 2024.

Article launch edit

Article duly launched.Marcd30319 (talk) 16:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Future improvements edit

Associated wiki-article to be written are:

Marcd30319 (talk) 18:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

A-Class Review edit

A-Class Review Page. Marcd30319 (talk) 18:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Who circumnavigated submerged without a periscope/snorkle? edit

I'd like to know, so maybe a link or something — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.178.166.233 (talk) 11:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Slow driving costs more? edit

From the article, we have:

Admiral Burke's classified response dated 18 January 1960 acknowledged the technical feasibility of Project Magellan while further noting that the "Magellan route" could be transited in "56 days at 20 knots (37 km/h; 23 mph) and 75 days at 15 knots (28 km/h; 17 mph)," with the latter option costing an additional $3.34 million USD in nuclear fuel consumed.

Surely this cannot be correct? Travelling faster through the water consumes less fuel? --Pete (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

That's what the sourcing stated. I suspect that has to back-end cost of refueling Triton earlier than later.Marcd30319 (talk) 13:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Operation Sandblast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Operation Sandblast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply