Talk:Notre Dame de Lorette

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

comment

edit

An introduction about the topic will be helpful!

edit

The links to the French page and vice versa are wrong (the French page church is in Paris)--Grahamec 08:35, 25 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notre Dame de Lorette

edit

Is also a church in the 9th arrondissement of Paris! This article is too narrow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.14.195.7 (talk) 16:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Where can we find sources for this? Nsaa (talk) 14:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
What about a simple GOOGLESEARCH?! C'mon! Why on earth should I be lying about this?! Top hit when you search on google is not what this article is going on about but - TADAH! The church in PARIS!Google search and the TOP RESULT: [www.notredamedelorette.org/ Paroisse notre dame de lorette, à paris (75)] Don't forget to add http: and double foreslashes to the link
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Notre Dame de Lorette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply