Talk:Nehaj Fortress

Merger

This article and Nehaj indeed cover the same topic even though the Nehaj article is supposedly on a hill that is site of the fortress. Moreover, nearly entire contents are duplicated between the two articles. Merger appears to be the only plausible solution, although I would prefer merger to Nehaj instead, where the hill and the eponymous fortress could be covered properly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:40, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Still, the hill is not really notable by itself, and there is not much to be said about it that is unrelated to the fortress. Anyway, having Nehaj Fortress as a merge target does not preclude the coverage of the hill there. GregorB (talk) 13:06, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Indeed, a look at the List of forts supports your idea.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:30, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Cleanup

I propose splitting the existing lead section into a lead paragraph, an "Etymology" section beginning at "the name Nehaj...", and a "History" section beginning at "It was built...". Would this suffice to fix the "lead too long" issue? U. E. Aduan (talk) 14:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)