Talk:Nå skruva Fiolen

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
Good articleNå skruva Fiolen has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 20, 2022Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nå skruva Fiolen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 16:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

I will undertake this review tomorrow. --K. Peake 16:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Super, thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Infobox looks good!
    • Thanks.
  • "and mimics the rhythm" → "and mimicking the rhythm"
    • Done.
  • "and certainly pretended to play it" → "certainly pretending to play it"
    • Done.
  • Use double speech marks instead for "screw"
    • Done.
  • Add a sentence mentioning Fred Åkerström's recording at the end of the lead, as this is notable
    • Done.

Background edit

  • Good
    • Noted.

Epistle edit

Music and verse form edit

  • Add relevant text to the audio sample to justify its usage
    • Done.
  • Wikilink cello
    • Done.
  • Pipe 2
    4
    time to Duple and quadruple metre
    • Done.
  • Wikilink timbre
    • Not done, the article is about the quality of a tone, not the meaning here.
  • "on the 3rd and 4th lines," → "on the third and fourth lines," per MOS:NUM
    • Done.

Lyrics edit

  • Img looks good!
    • Noted.
  • "It is subtitled" → "The composition is subtitled" to avoid overusage of it
    • Done.
  • Remove commas around Paul Britten Austin
    • Done.
  • Versions of the start of Epistle No. 2 → Starting lines of Epistle No. 2
    • Done.

Reception and legacy edit

Notes edit

  • Shouldn't there be sources for the info of the notes since they are not mentioning anything corresponding with refs next to them?
    • Added.

References edit

  • Copyvio score is undetectable at 0%!!!!
    • Noted.
  • Shouldn't ref 10 be cited in place of ref 6 since that also invokes p. 63?
    • Noted, but ref 6 is more specific, which is better for its task.
  • Cite Bellman.net as publisher instead on ref 9
    • Done.
  • WP:OVERLINK of Fred Åkerström on ref 15
    • Done.
  • Pipe WEA Records to Warner Music Group and fix WP:OVERLINK of Fred Åkerström on ref 16
    • Done.
  • Pipe Sterling to Sterling Records (Sweden) on ref 17
    • Done.

Sources edit

  • Good
    • Thanks.

External links edit

  • Shouldn't you write on YouTube after the links to the videos?
    • Done.

Final comments and verdict edit

  •  Pass now, quick response once again! --K. Peake 07:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply