Talk:Mulhim Ma'n

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Al Ameer son in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mulhim Ma'n/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 21:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


Comments

  • "their grip over" control? Bit more neutral tone.
  • "in 1636. In 1657" repetitive.
  • 1636 was an error actually, removed. Al Ameer (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "tax farmer" what's one of those?
  • I could tell you it's not of the Ol' MacDonald variety. Should I explain this a bit in the lead or the term's first mention in the body?
  • "of the Chouf who" if you're not saying Chouf region, shouldn't this just be "of Chouf who"?
  • In the sources it is always introduced as "the Shuf" or "the Chouf". Similar to "the Galilee" or "the Rockys". Al Ameer (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "Grand Duke of Tuscany" is there a link for this?
  • "southern Beqaa Valley was" overlinked.
  • "a one year term' one-year.
  • "governor of Tripoli.[17]" tripoli overlnked.
  • "taxes in Keserwan, the" overlinked.
  • "of Safed, which" overlinked.
  • "and the Shia Muslim Hamade" overlinked.
  • "later succeeded Bashir" unreferenced.
  • First biblio entry needs an en-dash in the year range.
  • As does Olsaretti.

That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 08:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks The Rambling Man. Almost finished. Need to add that citation for Bashir's succession. Otherwise, just let me know about the tax farm explanation. Al Ameer (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
I think tax farmer needs a footnote, referenced of course, to explain to people like me who haven't got a clue! The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:12, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@The Rambling Man: Done! Al Ameer (talk) 04:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply