Talk:Mujhse Dosti Karoge!

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Nicholas Michael Halim in topic GA Review

Official Casting edit

Here's the official casting of this movie. Please do not move around with the cast.[1]

  1. Hrithik Roshan
  2. Rani Mukerji
  3. Kareena Kapoor
  4. Satish Shah
  5. Kiran Kumar
  6. Smita Jaykar
  7. Himani Shivpuri
  8. Sachin Khedekar

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 01:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mujhse Dosti Karoge!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sources edit

Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mujhse Dosti Karoge!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 03:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Improve the non-free rationale for the poster with this template.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 03:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Other than that, the infobox looks great.
  • Add a comma after Rani Mukerji and "Pooja Sahani (Mukerji)".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 03:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Plot edit

  • "Pooja, Raj and Tina" → "Pooja, Raj, and Tina"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "attracted Tina" → "attracted to Tina"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "with via e-mail" → "with him via e-mail"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a comma after "her name".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "despite of being" → "despite being"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "realises" → "realizes"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "apologise" → "apologize"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Plot is under 700 words, so they're no problems with WP:FILMPLOT.

Cast edit

  • Instead of citing the same source for every character, might I suggest adding a simple "Credits adapted from Bollywood Hungama.[2]" to the top of the section?
  Not done Because there are source I cited from Rediff.com and Box Office India. The actor who plays young Tina does not mentioned on Bollywood Hungama, as well as Raja Vaid. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 00:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Production edit

  • "on 1996" → "on the 1996"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a comma after "Mukerji, Roshan".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "stars in the film, because" → "star in the film because"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "looks was the" → "looks were the"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The reference after "Yash Raj Films" doesn't say Aditya Chopra was a producer.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • In the second paragraph, can you explain when the actors were cast?
No sources or links mentioned that. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "more ... about" → "more [...] about"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Soundtrack edit

  • "described its soundtrack" → "described its soundtrack as"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "mixed response" → "mixed responses"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Release edit

  • Remove the comma after "across India".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "total grossing" → "total gross"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Remove the comma after "(US$4.7 million)".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "It was opened" → "It opened"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The last sentence should be moved to #Critical_reception, which should be retitled #Reception.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reception edit

  • Remove the comma after "of the leads".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "part as a" → "part as"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

References edit

  • Try archiving all sources (either manually or with this tool).

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·