 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 April 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Merge proposal
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Merge Evil Empire (company) to Motion Twin per consensus in favor of that merge in particular.
I propose merging Evil Empire (company) into a Motion Twin legacy section. The standalone notability of Evil Empire is insufficient and this may be covered here and perhaps on The Rogue Prince of Persia#Development. IgelRM (talk) 23:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
I would personally let it be given that the company had started to take on its own identity distinct from just an offshoot development team for Dead Cells, though it could need more time to be able to be written into a satisfactory state.MimirIsSmart (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)- But it cannot be written to standard because of lack of standalone sources. Own identity isn't a policy for an article. At best I could see it moved to draftspace. (Trying to have more discussions before AFD nominations but struggling) IgelRM (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom. OceanHok (talk) 11:13, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support, but retarget to The Rogue Prince of Persia, an article whose subject has preliminary input from the company instead of a company who contracted them for some additional work. MimirIsSmart (talk) 11:21, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- But it cannot be written to standard because of lack of standalone sources. Own identity isn't a policy for an article. At best I could see it moved to draftspace. (Trying to have more discussions before AFD nominations but struggling) IgelRM (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment @IgelRM: @OceanHok: @MimirIsSmart: Do you think we could form a consensus on the appropriate target for this merge? I'm leaning towards to Motion Twin, but it'd be nice to have a consensus and for y'all to weigh in further on Motion Twin vs. The Rogue Prince of Persia. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 02:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- The Rogue Prince of Persia is definitely more appropriate as the target considering that they're directly involved in development of the game while Motion Twin is a company they collaborated with and hence is a less relevant topic to the company itself. MimirIsSmart (talk) 04:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Support merge to Motion Twin. They seem to be most directly tied to it and have an equally significant involvement in both the Prince of Persia and Dead Cells games, making a redirect to one or the other improper. Being directly founded as part of an agreement with Motion Twin indicates to me more than just tangential relation. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:20, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- I think redirecting to either page will be fine. OceanHok (talk) 15:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.