Talk:Monuments of National Importance (India)
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
State protected Monuments
editState protected monuments has no relation to ASI. ASI website has only kept list which state archaeology dept have send them.State protected monuments are notified via [state government legislation's http://asi.nic.in/asi_mission_legislations.asp] --naveenpf (talk) 03:54, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Requested move 26 February 2022
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved to Monuments of National Importance (India). After extended time for discussion, there is a consensus that the title should be changed, but less clarity as to the target. However, several editors have spoken up for including "India" (with or without parentheses), and the nominator has agreed that this is acceptable. BD2412 T 03:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Monuments of National Importance of India → Monuments of National Importance – "of India" is not part of the proper name. Or in case a disambiguator is needed the proper format is "Monuments of National Importance (India)". Marcocapelle (talk) 21:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 03:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. Disambiguation is required (Georgia uses an identical name, and many other nations use similar names), and "of India" is natural disambiguation. BilledMammal (talk) 03:17, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Natural disambiguation does not apply here, "of India" does not make it a more complete name. See Wikipedia:NCDAB. It is simply not how it is named. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Lists has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 03:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject India has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 03:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support per WP:PRECISE. There's no other subject with the name "Monuments of National Importance", so disambiguation is not necessary. Georgia's designation, Immovable Cultural Monuments of National Significance, is an entirely different title, as is with the case with other nations. -- Ab207 (talk) 06:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose, probably adding (India) would work. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Monuments of National Importance already redirects here. When there's no other title which could be reasonably be confused with this one, disambiguation is not necessary. -- Ab207 (talk) 13:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support Since there is no name even remotely similar to what is nominated, the move will be good idea. Sajaypal007 (talk) 14:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support There is no other with the same name outside India. AnM2002 (talk) 09:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose "Monuments of National Importance" but Support "Monuments of National Importance (India)" per precision and naturalness. Without the DAB, it's confusing to our readers. But I respect the fact that proper names should be used in this case. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 22:28, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- As nominator I would also be ok with Monuments of National Importance (India). I think it is a fair compromise. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.