Talk:Mohammed al-Qahtani

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 173.88.246.138 in topic To add to article

"Sergeant A"? edit

The interrogation log Time made available describes a female "Sergeant A" as the lead investigator during the 4:00 to 12:00 shift. I wonder if it was Sergeant Jeanette Aracho-Burkart, the interrogator who is known to have worn skimpy clothes, and to have reached inside her pants and faked smearing detainees' faces with red liquid she said was her menses. -- Geo Swan 05:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

foreign fighters --> foreigners edit

I changed the characterization of the large roundup of foreigners in post-invasion Afghanistan, and the Pakistan "tribal areas", from "foreign fighters" to simply "foreigners".

The Denbeaux study definitely demonstrated that the Guantanamo detainees largely weren't "fighters".

  • "No surprises in the war on terror," BBC, February 13 2006
  • The Denbeaux study methodically analyzed the allegations US intelligence officials placed against the detainees. Only 8% of the 517 detainees who went through a Combatant Status Review Tribunal were alleged to be fighters.
  • Many critics who have read the transcripts that the DoD has been forced to release have grave doubts over the credibility of the allegations, and suspect a significant fraction of the remaining detainees are not just not terrorists, not just not "fighters", but are innocent men, who have zero association with Al Qaeda, the Taliban, or terrorism, and were merely unlucky enough to be found in the wrong place at the wrong time.

No doubt whomever characterized the Guantanamo detainees as "foreign fighters", as if this were a proven fact, didn't realize it was POV -- but it is IMO -- highly so. -- Geo Swan 03:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Investigations? edit

Die the Times publication of the log lead to any criminal investigations? What is described clearly breaks the Geneva Conventions and US law. 88.73.110.3 12:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


Trial and execution edit

  • I guess that the trial would take place in Guantanamo itself, but what about the execution and the execution technique. Would they use lethal injection ? Where would it take place ? Hektor (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • They didn't seek a death sentence for Moussaui, who may merit the description of "20th hijacker" more than Al Qahtani. After reading the transcript from his 2006 ARB hearing I reconsidered whether he actually was supposed to be one of the hijackers.
  • I found the tone of his hearing very different from the tone of the 2005 hearings. The Presiding Officer practically begged him to use his influence to get fellow captives to attend their hearings. (Less than 20% attended the 2006.)
  • They probably will seek the death sentence for KSM -- that is one way to shut him up, so the public doesn't get a graphic description of the torture he underwent. A mistake, in my opinion, because, when it is widely recognized he couldn't possibly have played as central a role as he confessed to under torture it would be really helpful if he was still alive to try to (humanely) get the real story. Geo Swan (talk) 03:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

questionable edits... edit

An anonymous IP made what I regard as questionable edits. The role of the wikipedia is not to serve as a hagiography.

They changed extrajudicial detention to simply detention. Extrajudicial detention is both accurate and neutral.

Calling the CCR a "a radical left wing organisation" is editorializing. Calling the CCR "a radical left wing organisation with ties to George Soros" -- is a tie to George Soros supposed to justify calling the organization "radical left wing organization"? Well, it is WP:OR.

There is an open question as to whether a large number of captives were tortured. But there are three captives that the DoD has acknowledged were subjected to extreme interrogation methods that practically everyone but the Bush administraton acknowledges were tortured. KSM and Abu Zubaydah are two of them. And Muhammad al Qahtani was the third. The article said "torture" prior to the IP's edits. The IP put "alleged torture". Since the DoD acknowledged using extended interrogation methods on him, I will change it to that wording. Geo Swan (talk) 23:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

reads somewhat oddly edit

A large portion of this article seems to be more or less a dump of primary sources---verbatim transcripts, quotes, timelines, etc. From an encyclopedia article (a tertiary source) I would've expected a more concise summary, based mainly on secondary and other tertiary sources, with only occasional quotes of the primary sources where particularly useful to the reader. As it stands it's kind of hard to read, especially for a nonspecialist. --Delirium (talk) 23:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree, and in particular I would point out that there is zero information about him other than his status as a prisoner. If you look in the box to the right you can discover that he is a Saudi and when he was born, but there should be an introductory sentence containing this information as well as a basic description, if anything is known about his prior life. What is he in addition to a detainee—a scion of a rich family, like Osama bin Laden? a poor laborer who wound up fighting in Afghanistan? He is a person as well as a case. Languagehat (talk) 14:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reads more like a minute-by-minute update on a news site than an encyclopedic reference. Definitely needs a reorganisation, if not an entire rewrite. 137.44.1.174 (talk) 15:53, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

explanation... edit

The image that i have removed from the article violates the basic rules of Wikipedia. It is the own work of a Wikipedia editor who took a primary source combined it with other sources and then interpreted them. This is a violation of WP:OR. The fact that these are mostly primary sources has also further problems as it does not comply with the policies of BLP's of living people. So i see this topic as taken to the talk page and the image should not be re-included until consensus has been reached. IQinn (talk) 10:02, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

move edit

I see the need to move this article to a better name. I suggest to move this page to Mohammed al Qahtani. The new name is based on these reliable sources:

and more...

I strongly believe that the from me suggested new name Mohammed al Qahtani is an improvement and should be performed as soon as possible. Any objections? IQinn (talk) 07:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't have any strong objections, Kahtani and Qahtani seem to have equal validity and common useage...I don't agree it's "better" either way - but I'm also not sure it's "worse" either way. Just be sure to update the spelling in the article. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 15:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Some early press reports called him "al Kahtani". I have no objection to standardizing on "al Qahtani". However, Jabir Hasan Muhamed Al Qahtani, Muhammed Fahad Al Qahtany, Muhammad Jafar Jamal al-Kahtani, Said Muhammad Husayn Qahtani could all also be called Mohammed al Qahtani. I suggest any renaming should take this into account. Geo Swan (talk) 01:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Will start to move the article to Mohammed al Qahtani per this discussion by adding {db-move} to the redirect. IQinn (talk) 01:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Big, practically unexplained, excision of referenced material edit

This edit removed considerable material, justified by the edit summary "deleted erroneous politically motivated information".

This material was properly referenced to WP:RS. If the contributor who made this excision thinks they have concerns that are justified by policy I would recommend offering them on this talk page.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 00:42, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 17:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


Mohammed al QahtaniMohammed al-Qahtani — Correct name with the dash, see Template:9-11 hijackers also, showing all the other names with the dash. JohnCengiz77 (talk) 20:40, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Comment Could you please explain why this should be the correct name? The Time and the New York Times and many other important sources do not use a dash. IQinn (talk) 23:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • The Time link does use the dash - well after the first usage of the name, for example one may read about "Waleed al-Shehri" written as "Waleed Alshehri" or "Waleed Al Shehri" or "Waleed al Shehri" in news reports so it's just the standard practise of transliterating Arabic names. I thought it would be more authentic and proper with the dash.

Regards. JohnCengiz77 (talk) 08:25, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hmm actually after doing some more research i do not know what is better with or without dash? :) The sources are split and i do not have further knowledge on the topic. So i leave it up to you or other people. I am fine with either version of it. Regards. IQinn (talk) 08:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

interwiki French edit

Please correct the interwiki to French : fr:Mohammed al-Kahtani

Thanks

83.217.136.39 (talk) 22:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mohammed al-Qahtani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mohammed al-Qahtani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

To add to article edit

To add to this article: Mohammed al-Qahtani has been diagnosed with schizophrenia (diagnosed years before his detention), and also suffers from major depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 22:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply