Talk:Medium of exchange

In relation to barter

Thank you for defining this very clear concept that helped us to define what barter is. Olivierchaussavoine 19:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Time

A medium of exchange must retain it´s value over time, therefore it must have memory. Most exchange mechanism models (if any), do not take memory into consideration.

I´ll make the addition to the list. (Fractalhints (talk) 16:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC))

Banks & Medium of Exchange

I very much disagree with the second paragraph under "From barter to exchange". Banking need not depend upon the existence of "worthless currency". Banking can certainly function in a "gold coin" only society. I also disagree with the statement that banking must be backed by the state. Early U.S. banks were private entities. 147.177.36.73 (talk) 19:45, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

NPOV dispute - Definition

The assertion that fiat money "creates one of the worst frauds against humanity and is the root cause of the continuum of economic crises" does not appear to be neutral in position. For example, I doubt that a Marxist would agree. If the assertion were something like "according to X, fiat money is ...", then there wouldn't be a problem. In other words, I'm not disputing that this point of view belongs in the article, I'm simply disputing that this point of view should be stated as fact. Nmj4 (talk) 16:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

I've tried to improve some of the language in the disputed section (correct me if I misunderstood something). I also tried to address the POV problem by introducing the disputed claim as one possible alternative, and then offering a reference to an alternate interpretation. Nmj4 (talk) 16:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

It's been a month, and not enough people seem to be interested for this dispute to qualify as a discussion. I'm removing the POV tag. Nmj4 (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medium of exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070614014529/https://www.egwald.com/ubcstudent/aboriginal/exchanges.php to http://www.egwald.com/ubcstudent/aboriginal/exchanges.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Medium of exchange

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Medium of exchange's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "mankiw":

• From Standard of deferred payment: Mankiw, N. Gregory (2007). Macroeconomics (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers. ISBN 0-7167-6213-7.
• From Money: Mankiw, N. Gregory (2007). "2". Macroeconomics (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers. pp. 22–32. ISBN 0-7167-6213-7.
• From Fiat money: N. Gregory Mankiw (2014). Principles of Economics. p. 220. ISBN 978-1-285-16592-9. fiat money: money without intrinsic value that is used as money because of government decree

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:36, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done thanks Anomie Jonpatterns (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Medium of Exchange and Measure of Value not good enough

This whole section should be removed as tangential I have covered the important points in a new section explaining just how the medium of exchange works Most of this section is turgid text and neoliberal ideology, which I have marked as dubious. E.g.

"Fiat currencies' most important and essential function is to provide a 'measure of value'" - Who's to say what is the 'most important' function. Why does this even need saying on the medium of exchange page?

"It should have constant intrinsic value" - The dollar does perfectly well with no intrinsic value.

"Gold was long popular as a medium of exchange" - This is a goldbug assertion. Gold was never as popular a medium as silver, cowry shells, bills of exchange. Gold has been minted into many coins, but its use as a medium of exchange was only really introduced as a result the great (silver) bullion famine, and even then only for high value items and international trade.

"[Gold] had a constant value" - This is only possible to assert under the gold standard when the price was mandated by law and constant therefore by definition. It is not because of any chemical properties of gold that its value is constant. The rest of the section is just irrelevant. Matslats (talk) 17:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

I agree this section is poor. Jonpatterns (talk) 20:51, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Lede

I disagreed with the new lede saying:

A medium of exchange is anything which is exchanged with one party for what one has, and and with another party for what one wants.

This misses the point and would mean anything that could be bartered would have the function of medium of exchange. The critical thing about the function of medium of exchange it that it is widely accepted - thus it can act as an intermediary.

See https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mediumofexchange.asp

I've rewrote the lede to emphasize that medium of exchange comes from considering the functions of money. Jonpatterns (talk) 20:51, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Jon I was describing the literal meaning, how an exchange can be mediated by a medium. The wide acceptance of a medium of exchange or the convention to use one particular medium in all exchanges in a market might make it money, but this page is not about money. To me it is very important to understand how money acts as a medium of exchange, by splitting the barter etc, before adding the extra factors and complications around the politically charged notion of what is money and who decides what is money. Matslats (talk) 21:35, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Arpan

Medium of exchange 49.149.110.170 (talk) 13:06, 22 March 2023 (UTC)